Navigating Retirement Crossroads: Private Debt in the Age of the Great Wealth Transfer

1. Executive Summary

Baby Boomers approaching retirement find themselves at a unique financial crossroads. Decades of economic growth have positioned many favorably, yet significant anxieties persist regarding the stability and accessibility of traditional retirement savings.¹ Concerns center on the potential erosion of wealth due to stock market volatility, particularly influenced by the political climate; the steady drain of investment fees charged regardless of performance; and restrictive liquidity rules that penalize access to funds when needed [User Query]. Compounding these individual concerns are broader challenges, including potential retirement savings gaps for a significant portion of the generation, rising healthcare and long-term care costs, and uncertainties surrounding longevity and the future of Social Security.¹

Against this backdrop, private debt, also known as private credit, emerges as a potential alternative investment strategy. This asset class, characterized by direct lending to companies outside of public markets, has grown substantially, offering features that may align with the needs of Boomers seeking portfolio diversification, potentially stable income streams, and fee structures linked to performance.³

This white paper explores these themes in detail. It acknowledges and analyzes the validity of Baby Boomer retirement concerns, provides a clear explanation of private debt structures and strategies, and evaluates how this asset class might address specific investor anxieties regarding volatility, fees, and liquidity. Furthermore, it contextualizes this discussion within the ongoing “Great Wealth Transfer”—the unprecedented intergenerational shift of assets—highlighting how private debt might fit into the evolving financial landscape and address the potential need for income generation to fund longer retirements and cover potential long-term care expenses.² The purpose is to provide Baby Boomers and their advisors with a comprehensive framework for evaluating the potential role of private debt within a diversified retirement investment strategy.

2. The Shifting Landscape of Retirement: Addressing Baby Boomer Concerns

Introduction

The Baby Boomer generation occupies a distinct position in financial history. Many benefited from periods of strong economic growth, affordable housing, and booming equity markets during their prime working years.¹ However, as they transition towards retirement, they face a complex and often uncertain landscape. Specific anxieties about preserving wealth, managing costs, and ensuring access to funds are prevalent and valid, shaping their investment outlook and driving a search for more resilient retirement solutions.

2.1 Market Volatility and the Search for Stability

A primary concern among Baby Boomers nearing retirement is the impact of market volatility on their accumulated savings. Surveys indicate a significant level of apprehension: 34% of Baby Boomers cite market volatility as a top concern regarding their finances and ability to meet goals, while 39% express concern about the U.S. political climate’s impact on their investments—a higher percentage than observed among younger generations like Millennials (21%) and Gen X (33%).⁶ This sentiment is reflected in a generally less positive outlook on investments compared to younger cohorts and a higher degree of uncertainty about the financial future, expressed by 31% of Boomers.⁶ For some retired Boomers, market volatility was indeed a challenge faced during their savings accumulation years.⁷

This heightened sensitivity to market swings, especially those perceived to be linked to political instability, is understandable. Boomers are operating within or near the “retirement risk zone”—the critical period surrounding the transition from accumulation to decumulation. During this phase, significant market downturns can have a disproportionately damaging impact on their financial security, as there is less time to recover losses before funds are needed to cover living expenses. The sequence of returns becomes paramount; poor returns early in retirement can drastically reduce the longevity of a portfolio. The constant media focus on political division and its potential economic consequences further fuels this sense of instability, making investments perceived as less correlated to public market sentiment or offering greater stability inherently attractive.

It is worth noting, however, that while individual concerns about volatility are valid, some analyses suggest a large-scale market “meltdown” driven solely by Boomer asset sales is unlikely. Research by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) points out that a large majority of Boomers hold relatively few financial assets to sell.⁸ Wealth is highly concentrated, and the small minority holding most assets may need to sell only a fraction in retirement.⁸ Furthermore, historical data shows retirees tend to spend down assets slowly, many even continuing to accumulate them.⁸ Factors like increased life expectancy (spreading potential sales over a longer period) and the intention of many Boomers to work past traditional retirement ages also mitigate the risk of a sudden, large sell-off.⁸ Statistical analysis indicates that macroeconomic factors like dividends and industrial production have historically explained far more of the variation in stock returns than demographic shifts.⁸ While acknowledging these structural factors provides balance, it does not diminish the psychological weight of volatility for individuals nearing or in retirement. This search for stability naturally leads to closer scrutiny of the costs associated with traditional investment approaches, especially when returns feel unpredictable.

2.2 The True Cost of Investing: Unpacking Fees in Traditional Portfolios

A second major concern voiced by Baby Boomers is the impact of investment fees on their retirement savings, particularly the frustration of paying fees regardless of whether their investments perform positively or negatively [User Query]. While often presented as small percentages, investment fees exert a powerful drag on long-term returns through the effect of compounding. Over decades, these costs can significantly diminish the nest egg retirees rely upon.¹⁰

Traditional retirement portfolios, often comprising mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and managed accounts within IRAs or 401(k)s, are subject to various fee structures:

• Expense Ratios: These fees cover fund management and operating costs and are charged as a percentage of assets within mutual funds and ETFs, irrespective of performance.¹⁰ While the asset-weighted average expense ratio for U.S. funds has notably declined over the past two decades (from 0.87% in 2004 to 0.36% in 2023), driven by investor awareness, competition, and a shift towards fee-based advisory models, this average can mask the higher costs of certain funds.¹³ For instance, while many index funds now charge very low fees (under 0.05%), actively managed funds averaged a higher 0.65% in 2023.¹¹ Data indicates 401(k) participants tend to hold lower-cost funds on average (e.g., average equity fund expense ratio of 0.39% in 401(k)s in 2019 versus a market average of 1.24% at the time), but even seemingly small percentages compound significantly over time.¹⁵
• Advisory Fees: Investors using financial advisors often pay fees based on Assets Under Management (AUM), commonly around 1% or more annually, which are also typically charged regardless of portfolio performance.¹¹ The industry shift towards fee-based models has influenced fund choices but represents another layer of cost.¹³
• Loads (Sales Commissions): Some mutual funds carry sales charges, either paid upfront (front-end load), reducing the initial investment amount, or when shares are sold (back-end load).¹⁰ While some argue front-end loads can be preferable for long-term investors if ongoing expense ratios are lower, they still represent an immediate reduction in invested capital.¹⁷
• Other Fees: Additional costs can include account maintenance fees, transaction costs for buying and selling securities, potential inactivity fees, and administrative fees within workplace retirement plans like 401(k)s.¹⁰

The cumulative effect of these fees over an investment lifetime can be substantial. Consider a hypothetical $100,000 investment earning a 7% average annual return before fees over 30 years. As illustrated in Table 1, even seemingly modest differences in annual fees lead to vastly different outcomes:

Table 1: The Long-Term Erosion of Investment Fees (Hypothetical)

Source: Hypothetical illustration based on principles and fee ranges discussed in.¹⁰ Assumes $100,000 initial investment, 7% gross annual return, fees deducted annually.

As the table demonstrates, a 0.75% difference in annual fees (comparing 0.25% to 1.00%) can result in over $135,000 less in savings after 30 years.¹⁰ Research suggests that paying higher fees (e.g., 1.9%) could potentially delay retirement readiness by several years compared to lower-cost scenarios.¹¹ A 1% annual fee can reduce total returns by nearly a third over a 35-year horizon.¹⁰

Beyond the absolute level of fees, the complexity and lack of transparency in how fees are charged contribute to investor frustration.¹⁰ Boomers may be subject to multiple layers of fees—at the fund level, advisor level, and platform level—that are not always clearly disclosed or aggregated. The desire is often not just for lower fees, but for fees that are understandable, transparent, and perceived as aligned with the value received, particularly when investment performance is uncertain. This frustration with paying fixed fees during periods of negative performance highlights a potential appeal for alternative fee structures where manager compensation is more directly tied to delivering positive results.

2.3 When Access Matters: Liquidity Constraints in Common Retirement Accounts

The third key concern for Baby Boomers is the feeling of being “locked out” of their retirement funds or facing penalties for accessing them, particularly as they approach or enter retirement when unexpected financial needs might arise [User Query]. This aversion is less about a dislike for illiquidity itself, and more about the punitive nature of penalties applied to funds often perceived as accessible, albeit intended for long-term goals.

Several common retirement savings vehicles impose significant constraints:

• IRA/401(k) Early Withdrawal Penalties: The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) generally imposes a 10% penalty on withdrawals from traditional IRAs, SEP IRAs, SIMPLE IRAs, and 401(k) plans made before the account holder reaches age 59½. This penalty is in addition to regular income taxes due on the withdrawn amount.¹⁹ For SIMPLE IRAs, the penalty can be as high as 25% if the withdrawal occurs within the first two years of participation.²⁰ While these rules are designed to encourage long-term saving, they can feel punitive when unforeseen circumstances require access to funds.
• Exceptions Have Limitations: While the IRS allows exceptions to the 10% penalty under specific circumstances—such as death, disability, certain high medical expenses (exceeding 7.5% of Adjusted Gross Income), health insurance premiums while unemployed, qualified education expenses, a first-time home purchase (up to $10,000), costs related to a birth or adoption (up to $5,000), or distributions taken as Substantially Equal Periodic Payments (SEPPs)—these exceptions are narrowly defined and do not cover every potential need for cash.¹⁹ Furthermore, even when the penalty is waived, the withdrawn amount (from pre-tax accounts) is typically still subject to ordinary income tax.¹⁹ The “Rule of 55” allows penalty-free 401(k) withdrawals for those who leave their job in the year they turn 55 or later, but only from the plan of the employer they just left.²¹
• Roth IRA Nuances: Roth IRAs offer more flexibility regarding contributions. An individual can withdraw their direct contributions (the principal amount invested) from a Roth IRA at any time, for any reason, without incurring taxes or penalties.²⁰ However, this flexibility does not extend to the earnings generated within the account. Withdrawals of earnings before age 59½ and before the account has met the five-year holding requirement are generally subject to both income tax and the 10% penalty, unless a specific exception applies.¹⁹ Roth conversions also have their own five-year holding period rules to avoid penalties on the converted amount.²⁰
• Annuity Liquidity Constraints: Annuities, often used for retirement income, typically come with significant liquidity restrictions. Most contracts impose surrender charges—substantial penalties for withdrawing funds during a specified surrender period, which can often last 5, 7, 10 years, or even longer.²³ These charges decrease over time but can significantly reduce the accessible funds in the early years of the contract. Even after the surrender period ends, withdrawals made before age 59½ may still be subject to the 10% IRS penalty on any gains.²³ While some annuity contracts permit limited penalty-free withdrawals each year (e.g., up to 10% of the account value), accessing larger amounts can be costly.²³

This landscape of penalties and restrictions fuels the frustration Boomers feel about accessing their own savings. It highlights a distinction: the aversion is primarily to unexpected penalties on funds assumed to be reasonably accessible, rather than a fundamental opposition to planned illiquidity undertaken consciously in exchange for potential benefits, such as the illiquidity premium offered by some alternative investments.

2.4 The Broader Picture: Savings Gaps, Healthcare Costs, and Longevity

These specific concerns about volatility, fees, and liquidity are amplified by the broader financial realities facing many Baby Boomers as they approach retirement. While collectively the wealthiest generation in history, holding trillions in assets ²⁶, this wealth is unevenly distributed, leaving a significant portion of the cohort financially vulnerable.⁹

• The Savings Dichotomy: Data paints a stark contrast. While Boomers control vast wealth ($78.55 trillion according to one source ²⁶, $80 trillion in assets per another ²⁷, including $17.3 trillion in home equity ²⁸), many individuals face substantial retirement savings shortfalls. Surveys reveal troubling statistics: roughly 1 in 5 Americans aged 50 and older have zero retirement savings ¹, and over a quarter (27%) of those aged 59+ report having nothing saved.¹ Median retirement savings figures are often cited as relatively low (e.g., $120,000 by Natixis, $225,000 for “Peak 65” Boomers by ALI) compared to estimated retirement needs (often $1 million or more).¹ One study indicated over half (52.5%) of the “Peak 65” Boomers (those turning 65 by 2030) have less than $250,000 in total assets, including savings and real estate.¹ Nearly half (45%) of Boomers acknowledge their savings are likely insufficient to maintain their desired lifestyle ²⁷, and analysis suggests two-thirds of the Peak 65 group may struggle to maintain their pre-retirement living standards.¹
• Rising Costs: The financial pressure is intensified by the rising costs of essential goods and services, particularly healthcare and long-term care (LTC).² Healthcare expenses are a top concern for working Boomers and tend to be higher for older adults, who are more likely to have chronic conditions.² LTC costs represent a significant and often unpredictable financial burden. Services like assisted living (averaging over $72,000 per year in 2025) and nursing home care (averaging over $131,000 per year) are expensive and typically not covered by Medicare, requiring out-of-pocket payment, long-term care insurance, or eventual reliance on Medicaid after spending down assets.¹ These costs can rapidly deplete retirement savings.¹
• Longevity and Social Security: Increasing life expectancies mean that retirement savings need to stretch further than ever before, often for 20 years or more.⁸ While Social Security provides a crucial income floor for many retirees ⁷, there are widespread concerns about the program’s long-term financial stability. Projections suggest the Social Security trust fund could face depletion challenges by the mid-2030s, potentially leading to benefit cuts unless legislative action is taken.¹ This uncertainty places a greater onus on individuals to secure their own retirement funding through savings and investments.⁸ For many, Social Security benefits alone are insufficient to cover LTC costs or maintain their desired standard of living.²⁷

Taken together, these factors—potential savings gaps, escalating healthcare and LTC expenses, increased longevity, and questions surrounding Social Security’s future—underscore a critical need for many Baby Boomers: reliable and potentially inflation-resilient income streams throughout retirement. Simply relying on capital appreciation may not be sufficient or sustainable. This pressing need for dependable income makes investment strategies focused on generating regular cash flow particularly relevant for this demographic, setting the stage for exploring alternatives like private debt.

3. Exploring Private Debt: An Alternative for Income and Portfolio Diversification

Introduction

Faced with the anxieties surrounding traditional retirement investments and the broader financial pressures of funding longer lifespans, Baby Boomers may find value in exploring alternative asset classes. Private debt, also commonly referred to as private credit or direct lending, has emerged as a significant component of the investment landscape. Its growth has been fueled, in part, by structural shifts in the financial system, particularly the pullback of traditional banks from certain types of lending following the Global Financial Crisis and subsequent regulatory changes.⁴ Private debt is not intended as a wholesale replacement for traditional assets like public stocks and bonds, but rather as a potential complement within a diversified portfolio for suitable investors seeking to address specific concerns about volatility, fees, liquidity, and income generation.

3.1 Understanding Private Debt: Structure, Strategies, and Market Role

• Definition: At its core, private debt involves lending capital directly to companies, typically outside the realm of publicly traded securities or broadly syndicated bank loans.⁴ These loans are privately negotiated between a lender (often a specialized fund) and a borrower, which is frequently a middle-market company—businesses often too large or complex for a single bank loan but too small or specialized to access public debt markets efficiently.⁴
• Fund Structure: Private debt funds operate by pooling capital from investors, known as Limited Partners (LPs), to make these loans.³ The fund is managed by a General Partner (GP), typically an investment management firm with expertise in credit analysis, structuring, and monitoring.³⁷ The most common legal structure is a Limited Partnership.³⁷ This structure contrasts sharply with public debt markets where bonds or loans are underwritten, syndicated to a wide group of lenders, and often traded on secondary markets.⁴
• Common Strategies: The private debt universe encompasses a range of strategies, each with distinct risk and return characteristics:

• Direct Lending (Senior Secured): This is the largest and most common segment, involving loans made directly to companies, often middle-market businesses backed by private equity sponsors.³ These loans are typically senior in the borrower’s capital structure (meaning they have priority for repayment) and are often secured by the borrower’s assets, aiming for lower risk relative to other debt forms.³
• Mezzanine Debt: This involves providing subordinated debt, which ranks below senior debt but above equity. It carries higher risk than senior loans and thus offers potentially higher returns, sometimes including equity participation features like warrants or conversion rights.⁴
• Unitranche Debt: A hybrid structure that combines senior and subordinated debt into a single loan facility with a blended interest rate.³⁵
• Venture Debt: Specialized financing for venture capital-backed startups and early-stage companies, often complementing equity funding.³⁵
• Distressed Debt: Investing in the debt of companies facing financial distress or bankruptcy, often involving active participation in restructuring efforts.⁴
• Specialty Finance: Lending outside of traditional corporate structures, such as asset-based lending, equipment leasing, consumer finance, real estate debt, or infrastructure credit.⁴
• Market Role & Benefits for Borrowers: Companies turn to private debt lenders for several reasons, including the speed and certainty of execution, flexibility in structuring loan terms, confidentiality, and the relationship-based nature of the lending process.³ Private lenders often fill a crucial financing gap for middle-market companies that may not fit the criteria of traditional banks or public markets.³³

It is crucial to recognize that “private debt” is not a single, uniform asset class. The term encompasses a broad spectrum of strategies with significantly different risk profiles and return objectives.³⁶ Senior secured direct lending, for example, generally targets lower risk and more stable income compared to the higher potential returns and associated risks of mezzanine or distressed debt strategies. Therefore, investors considering private debt must understand the specific strategy employed by a particular fund to ensure it aligns with their own risk tolerance and investment goals.

3.2 How Private Debt Aims to Address Key Investor Concerns

The characteristics of private debt, particularly within direct lending strategies, may offer potential solutions to the core concerns identified among Baby Boomers regarding traditional investments.

3.2.1 Potential for Lower Volatility and Diversification

A key appeal of private debt for volatility-averse investors lies in its return characteristics and valuation methodology. Unlike publicly traded stocks and bonds whose prices fluctuate daily based on market sentiment, private debt returns are primarily driven by the contractual interest payments received from borrowers and the eventual repayment of principal.⁴ Valuations of private loans are typically performed less frequently (e.g., quarterly) and are often based on factors like discounted cash flow analysis, comparable transactions, or third-party appraisal services, rather than moment-to-moment market trading.⁴ This methodology tends to result in lower reported volatility compared to public markets, offering a smoother return profile.⁴

Furthermore, private debt has historically exhibited low correlation with traditional asset classes like public equities and bonds.³⁵ This means its performance tends to move independently of broad market swings, offering potential diversification benefits when added to a traditional portfolio.³³ For Boomers whose portfolios may be heavily weighted towards public markets, allocating a portion to private debt could potentially enhance overall portfolio resilience by introducing exposure to a different segment of the economy (middle-market companies not always accessible via public markets) and a different primary return driver (credit performance rather than market sentiment).³³

However, it is essential to understand that lower reported volatility due to infrequent, appraisal-based valuations (“smoothed returns”) does not eliminate the underlying fundamental risk, particularly credit risk.³⁶ The possibility of borrower default remains a core consideration.

3.2.2 Fee Structures in Private Debt

The fee structure in private debt funds differs from typical mutual fund or advisory fee models and aims to create a stronger alignment between the manager (GP) and the investors (LPs). While the traditional “2 and 20” model (2% management fee and 20% carried interest) is standard in private equity, private debt terms often differ ³⁸:

• Management Fee: Typically ranges from 1.0% to 1.75% annually.³⁷ Crucially, particularly after the initial investment period, this fee is often calculated based on invested capital or Net Asset Value (NAV), rather than the total committed capital.³⁸ The specific basis (invested capital, committed capital, gross assets) and percentage can vary depending on the fund’s strategy, use of leverage, and size.³⁸
• Carried Interest (Incentive/Performance Fee): This represents the GP’s share of the fund’s profits. In private debt, it is often lower than in private equity, commonly ranging from 10% to 15%.³⁷ This fee is earned only after the LPs have received back their entire invested capital plus a predetermined minimum rate of return, known as the preferred return.⁴²
• Preferred Return (Hurdle Rate): This is a threshold return, typically expressed as an annualized Internal Rate of Return (IRR), that must be achieved for LPs before the GP is entitled to receive carried interest.⁴² For private debt funds, the hurdle rate is commonly set in the 6% to 8% range, often slightly lower than the typical 8% in private equity, reflecting potentially lower target returns for credit strategies.³⁷
• Distribution Waterfall: This mechanism dictates the order in which fund proceeds (from interest payments and loan repayments) are distributed. Typically, capital is first returned to LPs, then the preferred return is paid to LPs. After the hurdle is met, a “catch-up” provision may allocate a higher percentage of profits temporarily to the GP until they reach their agreed-upon carried interest percentage (e.g., 15%) on all profits above the initial capital return. Subsequent profits are then split according to the carried interest rate (e.g., 85% to LPs, 15% to GP).³⁷ “European” or whole-fund waterfalls, which require all LP capital and the preferred return across the entire fund to be returned before the GP receives carry, are generally considered more LP-friendly and have become more common in private credit.³⁸
• Other Fees and Expenses: LPs also bear the fund’s operating expenses, such as administrative, legal, audit, and custody costs, which are separate from the management fee.⁴⁴ Transparency regarding all fees and expenses is crucial, as emphasized by industry best practices like the ILPA Principles.⁴⁷

This structure, particularly the carried interest contingent on exceeding the preferred return hurdle, is designed to align the interests of the GP with those of the LPs. The GP’s potential for significant performance-based compensation is directly linked to delivering returns above the minimum threshold for investors.⁴² This contrasts with the flat AUM-based fees common in traditional investment management, which are paid regardless of performance and can be a source of frustration for investors, as noted earlier. While the overall fee structure can appear complex, the focus for investors should be on the potential net return after all fees and expenses, and the protection offered by the hurdle rate, which ensures LPs receive a baseline return before the GP shares significantly in the upside.³⁷

3.2.3 Navigating Illiquidity: Lock-ups, Redemptions, and the Illiquidity Premium

A fundamental characteristic of private debt is its general lack of liquidity.⁴ Unlike publicly traded bonds or stocks that can be bought or sold daily, investments in private debt funds are typically subject to significant restrictions on withdrawals.

• Typical Liquidity Terms:

• Closed-End Funds: The traditional structure involves investors committing capital for the entire life of the fund, often spanning 5 to 8 years or potentially longer, including extensions.⁴⁸ During this lock-up period, redemptions or withdrawals are generally not permitted.⁵⁰ Capital is returned to investors as the underlying loans are repaid, mature, or are occasionally sold.⁵⁴
• Semi-Liquid / Evergreen Funds: Newer fund structures, including some Business Development Companies (BDCs), interval funds, and European Long-Term Investment Funds (ELTIFs) or UK Long-Term Asset Funds (LTAFs), offer limited liquidity options, often after an initial lock-up period (e.g., 1-3 years).⁴⁸ These funds might allow redemptions periodically (e.g., monthly or quarterly) subject to specific notice periods (typically 30 to 90 days or more).⁵³ Crucially, these redemptions are often subject to gates, which limit the total amount that can be withdrawn from the fund during any given redemption window (e.g., 5-25% of the fund’s NAV).⁵³ Gates are designed to protect the remaining investors by preventing the fund manager from being forced to sell assets at unfavorable prices to meet excessive redemption requests, especially during periods of market stress.⁵⁴

• The Illiquidity Premium: Investors are generally compensated for accepting this lack of liquidity through the potential for higher returns or yields compared to similar, but more liquid, publicly traded credit instruments. This additional potential return is known as the “illiquidity premium”.³⁶
• Addressing Boomer Concern: This planned and potentially compensated illiquidity inherent in private debt differs fundamentally from the unexpected penalties applied to early withdrawals from traditional retirement accounts that are often perceived as being more accessible. Private debt is designed for capital that can be committed for the medium to long term. The lock-ups and gates are structural features intended to align the fund’s liability structure with its illiquid asset base and protect long-term investors from the actions of short-term ones.⁵¹ For Boomers considering private debt, it’s crucial to understand that this illiquidity is a feature, not a bug, and the investment should only represent a portion of their overall portfolio for which immediate access is not required. The specific fund structure—whether closed-end or semi-liquid—will dictate the exact nature and timing of any potential access to capital, making a thorough understanding of the fund’s terms paramount.⁵⁰

3.2.4 The Potential for Enhanced Income Generation

Perhaps the most compelling aspect of private debt for Baby Boomers facing retirement income challenges is its potential to generate regular, attractive income streams.

• Attractive Yields: Private debt strategies, particularly senior direct lending, are primarily focused on generating income through the interest payments made by borrowers.³ Historically, yields on private debt have often exceeded those available from traditional fixed-income investments like high-yield corporate bonds or broadly syndicated leveraged loans.³ For example, analysis based on indices like the Cliffwater Direct Lending Index (CDLI) suggests a historical yield premium over public credit benchmarks, although this premium can fluctuate based on market conditions and competition.³² Consensus expectations for 10-year private debt returns have also been favorable compared to public equities and fixed income in some surveys.⁵⁶
• Floating Rates: A significant portion of private debt loans feature floating interest rates, typically structured as a base rate (like the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, SOFR) plus a fixed credit spread.³ This structure can be advantageous in periods of rising interest rates, as the coupon payments adjust upwards, potentially increasing the income generated by the fund and mitigating the price depreciation risk faced by fixed-rate bonds in such environments.⁵⁰ Conversely, income may decrease if base rates fall.
• Senior Secured Position: Many direct lending strategies focus on loans that are senior in the borrower’s capital structure and secured by specific collateral.³ This seniority and security aim to enhance principal protection, increasing the likelihood of recovery even if a borrower faces financial difficulties. Furthermore, privately negotiated loans often contain stronger covenants (contractual agreements protecting the lender) compared to the more standardized terms found in broadly syndicated public loan markets, providing additional tools for risk management.³²

To illustrate the potential return profile, Table 2 provides a comparison of historical performance metrics for private credit relative to public market benchmarks, based on data referenced in the research.

Table 2: Comparative Historical Performance: Private Credit vs. Public Benchmarks (Illustrative)

Source: Illustrative ranges based on historical data patterns and relative performance discussed or implied in.³ Actual performance varies and past performance is not indicative of future results. Indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Standard deviation is a measure of volatility.

While private debt offers the potential for attractive and relatively stable income, it’s important to recognize that this income is not guaranteed. Its consistency depends on the underlying borrowers’ ability to meet their payment obligations (credit risk). Defaults or restructurings within the portfolio will impact income distributions. The floating-rate nature also means that income streams can fluctuate with changes in benchmark interest rates. Therefore, potential yield should be viewed in the context of these inherent risks.

This potential for enhanced, albeit not risk-free, income generation positions private debt as a relevant consideration for Baby Boomers navigating the financial challenges of retirement, particularly within the broader economic context of the Great Wealth Transfer.

4. The Great Wealth Transfer: Context for Retirement Planning and Investment Strategy

Introduction

The investment decisions and retirement planning challenges faced by Baby Boomers are unfolding against the backdrop of a monumental economic phenomenon: the Great Wealth Transfer (GWT). This unprecedented intergenerational shift of assets, primarily from the Baby Boomer and Silent Generations to their heirs, carries significant implications for individual financial strategies, wealth management, and the broader economy.⁵ Understanding the scale, timing, and dynamics of the GWT provides crucial context for evaluating how investments like private debt might align with the evolving needs and opportunities of Boomers during their retirement years.

4.1 Understanding the Scale and Timeline

The sheer magnitude of the GWT is staggering. Estimates vary slightly depending on the source and timeframe, but consistently point to tens of trillions of dollars changing hands. Some projections estimate $84.4 trillion will be transferred in the U.S. through 2045.⁵ More recent analysis by Cerulli Associates projects an even larger figure: $124 trillion expected to be transferred by 2048.⁵⁸ This represents roughly 72% of total U.S. household assets and exceeds the entire global GDP for 2023.⁶⁰

This transfer is not a distant event; it is actively underway and projected to accelerate over the next two decades.⁵ An estimated $13 trillion is expected to be passed on within the next five years alone, translating to wealth changing hands for roughly 10,000 individuals each day.⁶⁰

Baby Boomers are the central players in this transfer, expected to bequeath the largest share of this wealth—estimates range from $53 trillion to $79 trillion.⁵ The preceding Silent Generation is also contributing significantly, estimated to pass down around $15.8 trillion.⁵

The primary recipients initially are often surviving spouses. Projections indicate $54 trillion will first move “horizontally” to spouses, with over 95% of this amount expected to go to women, largely due to longer female life expectancies.⁵⁹ Subsequently, wealth flows “vertically” to younger generations, with Millennials and Gen X poised to inherit substantial sums (estimated around $46 trillion and $39 trillion respectively by Cerulli).⁶⁰ This dynamic is contributing to a significant shift in wealth control towards women.⁵⁹ It’s also important to note that a disproportionate amount of this transfer involves high-net-worth (HNW) and ultra-high-net-worth (UHNW) households; estimates suggest that the wealthiest 1.5% to 2% of households could account for 42% to over 50% of the total wealth transferred.⁵

4.2 Baby Boomer Assets: The Role of Real Estate and Liquidation Needs

A significant component of Baby Boomer wealth is tied up in real estate. As of mid-2024, Boomers held an estimated $17.3 trillion in home equity, representing about half the nation’s total.²⁸ For many individuals in this generation, their home is their single largest asset.²⁹

However, a crucial nuance in the GWT narrative is that the vast majority of Boomer homeowners do not appear to be planning widespread liquidation of their primary residences solely to fund their retirement living expenses.²⁹ Surveys indicate a strong preference for aging in place.²⁹ Only a small fraction (around 9%) explicitly plan to use home equity extraction methods like reverse mortgages for general retirement funding.²⁸ Instead, most intend to rely on other sources like savings, Social Security, investments, and pensions first.²⁸ A large majority (75%) plan to leave their homes, or the proceeds from their eventual sale, to their children or other family members.²⁸ Some reluctance to tap home equity might also stem from strategies to protect assets from Medicaid spend-down requirements when qualifying for long-term care benefits, as primary home equity is often partially exempt during the owner’s lifetime.⁶³

Despite this general reluctance to sell primary homes for retirement income, home equity does play a role for some Boomers, particularly when facing specific, high-cost needs like long-term care. Various methods are employed, including home equity loans (HELOANs), home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), cash-out refinances, reverse mortgages, or downsizing by selling the larger home and moving to a smaller one or a care facility.⁶⁴ One senior living marketplace reported that about half its customers use home equity to cover care costs, often lacking alternatives.⁶⁵ Reverse mortgages, in particular, can be structured to provide funds for LTC insurance premiums, cover care costs directly, or bridge gaps during insurance waiting periods.⁶⁸

Beyond home equity, the broader financial pressures discussed earlier—savings gaps, potential high LTC costs, and the need to fund longer lifespans—create a compelling need for income generation or selective asset liquidation for many Boomers.² Even if primary homes are retained, other investments may need to be repositioned or liquidated to meet ongoing expenses. Furthermore, the GWT itself is a two-way street for some Boomers who are simultaneously inheriting assets from their own parents (the Silent Generation). This influx of inherited capital often arrives at a time when the Boomer recipients are themselves retired or nearing retirement, creating an immediate need to invest these assets prudently, often with a focus on generating income to support their own extended retirement years.

This confluence of factors—managing existing assets, potentially receiving inheritances, facing significant retirement funding needs (particularly for unpredictable LTC costs), and holding substantial wealth even outside of primary residences—creates both a challenge and an opportunity. The challenge lies in making assets last and generate sufficient income over potentially long retirements. The opportunity lies in utilizing the available capital base, whether existing or inherited, to invest in strategies designed to meet these income needs. This dynamic makes income-focused alternative investments potentially very relevant for affluent Boomers navigating this generational wealth shift.

4.3 Positioning Private Debt within the Generational Wealth Shift

Within the context of the Great Wealth Transfer and the associated financial pressures on Baby Boomers, private debt strategies may offer characteristics that align well with the needs of this demographic.

• Alignment with Income Needs: The primary potential benefit of private debt, particularly direct lending, is its focus on generating regular income through contractual interest payments. This directly addresses the critical need for reliable income streams identified among Boomers facing savings gaps, rising costs (especially LTC), and the challenge of funding longer retirements, whether using their own capital or managing inherited assets [Insight 4.2.1].
• Capital Preservation Focus: Many private debt strategies, especially those focused on senior secured loans, prioritize capital preservation by taking a senior position in the borrower’s capital structure and securing the loan with assets. This aligns with the typical investment posture of retirees who are often more focused on protecting their principal than maximizing growth.
• Alternative to Low Traditional Yields: As Boomers manage their own accumulated wealth or deploy inherited capital, private debt presents a potential alternative to traditional fixed-income investments, which have offered historically low yields in recent years. Private debt seeks to provide potentially higher yields as compensation for illiquidity and credit risk, helping generate needed income without necessarily taking on the volatility associated with public equity markets.
• Potential Alignment with Inheritor Preferences: While the primary target audience is Baby Boomers, it is worth noting that some research suggests younger generations (Millennials and Gen Z), who are the ultimate inheritors in the GWT, show a greater preference for alternative investments, including private equity and private debt, compared to older investors.²⁶ Investing in such assets could potentially align with the preferences of future beneficiaries, although this is a secondary consideration for the Boomer investor’s own needs.

Ultimately, as Baby Boomers navigate longer lifespans and manage the complexities of transferring and receiving wealth during the GWT era, the core challenge is ensuring their assets can sustain them throughout retirement. Private debt, with its potential to provide consistent income over the medium term (the typical fund life), can be viewed as one potential tool within a diversified portfolio to help manage longevity risk and meet ongoing expenses. It offers a different risk/return profile and income stream compared to traditional public market assets, potentially complementing other retirement resources. However, this potential must be weighed against the unique risks inherent in the asset class.

5. Important Considerations and Risks in Private Debt Investing

Introduction

While private debt offers potential benefits that may align with the needs of Baby Boomers navigating retirement, it is imperative to approach this asset class with a clear understanding of its unique risks and complexities. Like all investments, private debt carries the potential for loss, and certain risks are particularly pronounced compared to traditional public market investments. Thorough due diligence and a realistic assessment of suitability are essential before committing capital.

5.1 Understanding Key Risks

Investors considering private debt should be aware of several primary risks:

• Credit Risk: This is the fundamental risk that the companies borrowing from the fund will be unable to repay their loans, leading to losses for investors.³ Private debt funds often lend to middle-market companies, which may have less financial resilience or diversification than large, publicly traded corporations, potentially increasing default risk, especially during economic downturns.³⁴ The skill of the fund manager (GP) in underwriting (evaluating borrower creditworthiness), structuring protective loan terms (covenants), and actively monitoring borrowers is critical in mitigating this risk.³² The private credit sector has grown significantly and has not yet experienced a severe, prolonged economic downturn at its current scale, adding an element of uncertainty.³⁴ Practices like capitalizing interest payments (Payment-In-Kind or PIK) can sometimes mask underlying borrower stress and potentially exacerbate credit risk if the borrower’s situation deteriorates.⁵⁷
• Illiquidity Risk: As previously discussed, private debt investments are inherently illiquid.³⁵ Capital is typically locked up for the duration of the fund’s life (often 5-8 years or more for closed-end funds), and there is generally no readily available secondary market to sell the investment before maturity.³⁵ Even semi-liquid structures offer only limited, periodic redemption opportunities, often subject to gates.⁵³ Investors must have a sufficiently long investment horizon and be comfortable committing capital they do not anticipate needing access to during the lock-up period.³
• Manager Risk (Selection Risk): The success of a private debt investment is heavily dependent on the expertise, discipline, and integrity of the fund manager (GP).³ The GP is responsible for sourcing attractive lending opportunities, conducting rigorous due diligence, negotiating loan terms, managing the portfolio, and handling any necessary restructurings or workouts if borrowers encounter difficulties.³² Performance can vary significantly between different managers, making manager selection a critical component of the investment process.³⁹ Evaluating a manager’s experience, particularly through various credit cycles, is crucial.³²
• Valuation Risk: Because private debt instruments are not publicly traded, their value is typically assessed periodically (e.g., quarterly) based on manager models, third-party valuation services, or appraisal techniques.⁴ While this contributes to lower reported volatility, it also introduces subjectivity and means the reported Net Asset Value (NAV) may not reflect the price at which an investment could be sold immediately, if a market existed. These “smoothed” returns can mask underlying volatility or changes in credit quality between valuation dates.³⁶
• Market and Competition Risk: The rapid expansion of the private credit market has led to increased competition among lenders.³² This competition could potentially lead to pressure on returns (tighter credit spreads) or a relaxation of lending standards (weaker covenants, higher leverage) as managers compete to deploy capital. Such trends could increase the risk of credit losses in the future if economic conditions worsen.³²

5.2 The Importance of Due Diligence and Suitability

Given these risks, private debt is not suitable for all investors. It is generally appropriate for sophisticated investors who meet specific eligibility criteria (such as being an “accredited investor” or “qualified purchaser” under securities laws ³⁷), fully understand the associated risks, and have the capacity to tolerate illiquidity within their overall financial plan.

Before investing, rigorous due diligence is essential:

• Manager Evaluation: Investors should thoroughly assess the fund manager’s track record (especially through different market environments), the experience and stability of the investment team, the clarity and discipline of the investment strategy, and the robustness of their credit underwriting and risk management processes.³² Understanding the manager’s approach to sourcing deals and handling potential defaults is critical.
• Alignment of Interests: Scrutinize the fund’s terms to ensure alignment between the GP and LPs. Key factors include the level of the GP’s own capital commitment to the fund (a meaningful commitment signals “skin in the game” ³⁸), the structure of the management fee (basis and rate), the carried interest percentage, the preferred return hurdle, and the waterfall structure (European vs. American).³⁸ While fee structures can create alignment, terms that disproportionately favor the GP (e.g., low hurdle, deal-by-deal carry, high fees on committed capital, minimal GP commitment) should be carefully evaluated.⁴² Resources like the Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA) Principles offer guidance on best practices for fund terms.⁴⁵
• Review of Fund Documents: Investors must carefully review the fund’s legal documentation, such as the Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) and Private Placement Memorandum (PPM). These documents detail the fund’s strategy, fees, expenses, liquidity provisions (lock-ups, redemption terms, gates), potential conflicts of interest, reporting standards, and other critical governance matters.⁴⁵
• Portfolio Context: An allocation to private debt should be considered within the broader context of the investor’s total portfolio, including their overall financial goals, risk tolerance, time horizon, and existing assets. The illiquidity of private debt means it should only represent a portion of the portfolio for which immediate liquidity is not a primary requirement.³ Diversification, even within private markets (potentially across different private debt managers or strategies), is also a prudent consideration.³⁹

6. Conclusion: Is Private Debt Right for Your Retirement Portfolio?

Baby Boomers navigating the transition to retirement face a unique set of financial challenges and anxieties. Concerns about public market volatility, the corrosive impact of investment fees, and restrictive access to traditional retirement funds are valid and widespread. These concerns are amplified by the realities of potentially insufficient savings for a significant portion of the generation, rising healthcare and long-term care costs, increased longevity, and uncertainties surrounding traditional income sources like Social Security. This complex environment, occurring alongside the massive Great Wealth Transfer, creates a compelling need for investment solutions that prioritize potential income stability, capital preservation, and transparent value alignment.

Private debt has emerged as a significant alternative asset class that aims to address some of these specific needs. By lending directly to companies, often in the middle market, private debt funds seek to generate potentially attractive income streams, often with floating rates that may offer some protection in rising rate environments. The typical fee structure, involving carried interest contingent on exceeding a preferred return hurdle, offers a different model of alignment compared to flat AUM fees. Furthermore, the asset class’s historically low correlation to public markets and its less frequent, appraisal-based valuations can result in lower reported volatility, appealing to investors seeking diversification and smoother return profiles.

However, these potential benefits must be weighed against the inherent risks and characteristics of private debt. Credit risk—the possibility of borrower default—is paramount and requires diligent manager underwriting and monitoring. Illiquidity is a defining feature; investors must be prepared to lock up capital for extended periods, understanding that access is restricted by design, albeit potentially compensated through an illiquidity premium. Manager selection is critical, as performance relies heavily on the GP’s expertise and discipline. Valuation methodologies differ from public markets, and the rapidly growing market landscape introduces potential risks related to competition and evolving lending standards.

Therefore, private debt should not be viewed as a universal solution but rather as a potentially valuable component within a diversified portfolio for the right type of investor. It is most suitable for sophisticated Baby Boomers who possess a thorough understanding of the risks, have a sufficiently long investment time horizon, can comfortably allocate capital they do not need immediate access to, and meet the required investor eligibility standards.

Ultimately, the decision of whether to incorporate private debt into a retirement strategy is a personal one. It requires careful consideration of individual financial circumstances, tolerance for risk, liquidity requirements, and long-term goals. Consulting with a qualified financial advisor who has expertise in alternative investments is strongly recommended to conduct thorough due diligence on specific fund offerings and determine if an allocation to private debt aligns with an investor’s unique retirement objectives in this evolving financial landscape.

Works cited

1. A Stark Contrast in ‘Peak 65′ Baby Boomers’ Retirement Savings …, accessed April 10, 2025, https://mylifesite.net/blog/post/a-stark-contrast-in-peak-65-baby-boomers-retirement-savings-pictures/
2. THE GROWING BURDEN OF RETIREMENT, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.nirsonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-Growing-Burden-of-Retirement.pdf
3. Essentials of Private Credit – Blackstone, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.blackstone.com/pws/essentials-of-private-credit/
4. Private Credit Investing: What You Need to Know | KKR, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.kkr.com/alternatives-unlocked/private-credit
5. Great Wealth Transfer – Wikipedia, accessed April 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Wealth_Transfer
6. orion.com, accessed April 10, 2025, https://orion.com/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2022/09/Orion_InvestorSentimentSurvey_Findings.pdf
7. A Tale of Two Realities: Most Retired Baby Boomers Feel …, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240618847145/en/A-Tale-of-Two-Realities-Most-Retired-Baby-Boomers-Feel-Financially-Secure-and-Fulfilled-Despite-Heavy-Reliance-on-Social-Security-New-Survey-Reveals
8. Retirement of Baby Boomers Is Unlikely to Precipitate Dramatic Decline in Market Returns, but B – GAO, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-06-718.pdf
9. Will the Demand for Assets Fall When the Baby Boomers Retire? – Congressional Budget Office, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/111th-congress-2009-2010/reports/09-08_baby-boomers.pdf
10. Small fees, big impact: Understanding the long-term cost of …, accessed April 10, 2025, https://fifthperson.com/small-fees-big-impact-long-term-cost-fees/
11. Are Investment Fees Putting Your Retirement at Risk? | Kiplinger, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.kiplinger.com/retirement/are-investment-fees-putting-your-retirement-at-risk
12. Understanding Investment Fees: Long-Term Impact on Returns – M1, accessed April 10, 2025, https://m1.com/knowledge-bank/understanding-investment-fees-long-term-impact-on-returns/
13. The 2023 US Fund Fee Study From Morningstar, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/business/insights/blog/funds/us-fund-fee-study
14. Morningstar’s 2023 Annual US Fund Fee Study, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/lp/annual-us-fund-fee-study
15. The Economics of Providing 401(k) Plans: Services, Fees, and Expenses, 2018 – Investment Company Institute, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.ici.org/pdf/per25-04.pdf
16. The Economics of Providing 401(k) Plans: Services, Fees, and Expenses, 2019 – Investment Company Institute, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.ici.org/pdf/per26-05.pdf
17. Everything You Need to Know About Investment Fees – Ramsey Solutions, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.ramseysolutions.com/retirement/investing-fees-how-much-too-much
18. This Is How Annuities, IRA, and Roth IRA May Make Your Retirement Better – Policy Engineer, accessed April 10, 2025, https://policyengineer.com/this-is-how-annuities-ira-and-roth-ira-may-make-your-retirement-better/
19. IRA Withdrawal Rules & Penalties | Ally, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.ally.com/stories/retirement/ira-withdrawal-rules/
20. IRA Early Withdrawals | Penalties, Exceptions & Options | Fidelity, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/retirement-ira/ira-early-withdrawal
21. 401(k) Withdrawal Rules: How to Avoid Penalties – Investopedia, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/111615/how-401k-works-after-retirement.asp
22. Roth IRA Withdrawal Rules | Charles Schwab, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/ira/roth-ira/withdrawal-rules
23. Can You Access Your Money Early? Understanding Annuity … – Due, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/can-you-access-your-money-early-understanding-annuity-liquidity
24. What is a Fixed Annuity and How Does it Work? – Guardian Life Insurance, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.guardianlife.com/annuities/fixed
25. Annuities | FINRA.org, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.finra.org/investors/investing/investment-products/annuities
26. The Great Wealth Transfer and its Implications for the American …, accessed April 10, 2025, https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mje/2025/04/03/the-great-wealth-transfer-and-its-implications-for-the-american-economy/
27. What Baby Boomers’ Financial Divide Means for the Senior Living Industry – myLifeSite, accessed April 10, 2025, https://mylifesite.net/blog/post/what-baby-boomers-retirement-savings-means-for-the-senior-living-industry/
28. Silver Tsunami Likely to Bring Wave of Wealth to Children of Baby …, accessed April 10, 2025, https://freddiemac.gcs-web.com/news-releases/news-release-details/silver-tsunami-likely-bring-wave-wealth-children-baby-boomer/
29. Peak Boomers Face Retirement Finance Challenges – AARP, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.aarp.org/money/retirement/peak-boomer-readiness/
30. Retirement Survey & Insights Report: The Generational Divide – Goldman Sachs Asset Management, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.gsam.com/content/dam/gsam/pdfs/common/en/public/articles/2024/am-retirement-survey-generational-report-2024.pdf?sa=n&rd=n
31. Are Baby Boomers Who Care for their Older Parents Planning for their Own Future Long-Term Care Needs?, accessed April 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3733542/
32. The risks and opportunities in Private Credit | BlackRock, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.blackrock.com/us/financial-professionals/insights/the-growth-in-private-credit
33. Private Debt – Cliffwater Funds, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.cliffwaterfunds.com/private-debt
34. Global Financial Stability Report, April 2024, Chapter 2: “The Rise and Risks of Private Credit,” April 16, 2024, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/GFSR/2024/April/English/ch2.ashx
35. Investments in Private Capital: Equity & Debt – CFA Institute, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.cfainstitute.org/insights/professional-learning/refresher-readings/2025/investments-in-private-capital-equity-debt
36. Private Debt: Features & Investment Traits | CFA Level 1 – AnalystPrep, accessed April 10, 2025, https://analystprep.com/cfa-level-1-exam/alternative-investments/features-and-investment-characteristics-of-private-debt/
37. An Explanation of Private Market Fund Fees | Portfolio for the Future – CAIA Association, accessed April 10, 2025, https://caia.org/blog/2023/09/23/explanation-private-market-fund-fees
38. Our First Private Credit Fees Study: What We Found in 2023 – Callan, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.callan.com/blog-archive/private-credit-fees-2023/
39. Private Debt in an Institutional Portfolio – Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst Association, accessed April 10, 2025, https://caia.org/sites/default/files/7_private_debt_2-26-18.pdf
40. How private debt is developing and why investors are looking for quality – Preqin, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.preqin.com/insights/research/blogs/how-private-debt-is-developing-and-why-investors-are-looking-for-quality
41. Private Debt: Not Your Average Asset Class – CION Investments, accessed April 10, 2025, https://cioninvestments.com/insights/private-debt-not-your-average-asset-class/
42. Private Markets Fees Primer – Meketa Investment Group, accessed April 10, 2025, https://meketa.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Private-Markets-Fees-Primer-FINAL.pdf
43. Private Equity Fees and Terms Study – Callan, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.callan.com/uploads/2020/10/37e84907421af91fbb36b2814ca55229/callan-private-equity-study-2020.pdf
44. Cliffwater 2022 Study on Private Fund Fees & Expenses for Direct Lending | Portfolio for the Future | CAIA – Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst Association, accessed April 10, 2025, https://caia.org/blog/2022/12/03/cliffwater-2022-study-private-fund-fees-expenses-direct-lending
45. Uncovering the Costs and Benefits of Private Equity – StepStone Group, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.stepstonegroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/StepStone_Uncovering_the_Costs_and_Benefits_of_PE.pdf
46. Negotiating Private Equity Fund Terms – K&L Gates, accessed April 10, 2025, https://files.klgates.com/files/171269_negotiating_private_equity_fund_terms.pdf
47. ILPA Principles 3.0:, accessed April 10, 2025, https://ilpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/ILPA-Principles-3.0_2019.pdf
48. What is private credit? Does it pose financial stability risks? – Brookings Institution, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-is-private-credit-does-it-pose-financial-stability-risks/
49. Temporarily Terrified by Thomas: Remarks on Private Credit – SEC.gov, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/peirce-remarks-private-credit-forum-101524
50. The investment time horizons in some private markets are changing. In this article, we profile four key private markets and exam – Hymans Robertson, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.hymans.co.uk/media/uploads/Taking_stock_of_liquidity.pdf
51. What Is a Lock-Up Period? How It Works, Main Uses, and Example – Investopedia, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/lockup-period.asp
52. Hedge Fund Lock-Up Period: Definition and Considerations – Repool, accessed April 10, 2025, https://repool.com/blog/hedge-fund-lock-up-period/
53. Proskauer’s Hedge Start: Key Hedge Fund Terms, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.proskauer.com/pub/proskauer-hedge-start-key-hedge-fund-terms
54. Meeting In The Middle – The Hedge Fund Journal, accessed April 10, 2025, https://thehedgefundjournal.com/meeting-in-the-middle/
55. Deciphering liquidity: Understanding the mechanics of new funds investing in private markets. – Schroders Capital, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.schroderscapital.com/en/global/professional/insights/deciphering-liquidity-understanding-the-mechanics-of-new-funds-investing-in-private-markets-/
56. Smart Money Continues to Like Private Debt and Private Equity – Cliffwater, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.cliffwater.com/ResourceArticle/smart-money-continues-to-like-private-debt-and-private-equity?docId=26535
57. Another Strong Year for Private Debt – Cliffwater, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.cliffwater.com/ResourceArticle/2024-study-on-private-fund-fees-and-expenses-for-
58. Dispelling myths about the ‘Great Wealth Transfer’ – CFA Institute, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.cfainstitute.org/insights/articles/great-wealth-transfer-myths-reality
59. Women will get most of the $124 trillion ‘great wealth transfer.’ Here’s why – NBC10 Philadelphia, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/business/money-report/women-will-get-most-of-the-124-trillion-great-wealth-transfer-heres-why/4132486/?os=%40%40nue0o&ref=app
60. The Great Wealth Transfer estimate just increased close to 50%. Is …, accessed April 10, 2025, https://catchlight.ai/advisor-resources/the-great-wealth-transfer-estimate-just-increased
61. $54 Trillion Will Transfer to Widows Through… | Cerulli Associates, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.cerulli.com/press-releases/54-trillion-will-transfer-to-widows-through-2048-more-than-95-will-go-to-women
62. institute.bankofamerica.com, accessed April 10, 2025, https://institute.bankofamerica.com/content/dam/economic-insights/women-and-wealth-creating-opportunities.pdf
63. A Little-Known Detail about Medicaid Qualification and Paying for Long-Term Care, accessed April 10, 2025, https://mylifesite.net/blog/post/a-little-known-detail-about-medicaid-qualification-and-paying-for-long-term-care/
64. ‘The one asset in their later years’: Home equity strategies for older homeowners, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/news/article/investing-ideas/202502201500BANKRATEBANKRATE1226003503
65. Can You Use Home Equity To Pay For Long-Term Care? | Bankrate, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/home-equity/can-you-use-home-equity-to-pay-for-long-term-care/
66. The Senior’s Guide to Paying for At-Home Long-Term Care: How Your Home Can be a Great Asset – Mortgage Calculator, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.mortgagecalculator.org/helpful-advice/long-term-care.php
67. How To Pay for Long-Term Care | Private Wealth Management, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.bairdwealth.com/insights/wealth-management-perspectives/2024/06/how-to-pay-for-long-term-care/
68. Reverse Mortgages: A Pathway to Long-Term Care Solutions – TheStreet, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.thestreet.com/retirement-daily/your-money/reverse-mortgages-a-pathway-to-long-term-care-solutions
69. Home Equity Strategies For Older Homeowners – Bankrate, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/home-equity/how-to-take-advantage-of-the-peak-in-senior-housing-wealth/
70. Navigating Homeownership: Expert Advice for Baby Boomers and Homebuyers – AD Mortgage, accessed April 10, 2025, https://admortgage.com/blog/navigating-homeownership-expert-advice-for-baby-boomers-and-homebuyers/
71. KKR Alternatives Unlocked: Alternative Investment Education, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.kkr.com/alternatives-unlocked