Seeking Stability Beyond Wall Street: How Private Debt Can Offer Consistent Income for Retiring Baby Boomers

1. Executive Summary

The current financial landscape presents significant challenges, particularly for the Baby Boomer generation approaching or entering retirement. Characterized by heightened volatility and uncertainty, the “ongoing chaos of Wall Street” often translates into daily anxieties for those watching their investment accounts fluctuate while relying on them for a secure future.¹ This generation faces a unique confluence of pressures: ensuring sufficient income to last through potentially longer lifespans, preserving accumulated capital, and navigating markets with a understandably lower tolerance for risk.²

Traditional investment portfolios heavily weighted towards publicly traded stocks and bonds, while offering liquidity, have exposed many retirees to unnerving market swings and potential capital erosion precisely when they can least afford it.¹ This environment necessitates exploring alternative avenues for wealth management. Alternative investments, broadly defined as assets outside the conventional categories of public stocks, bonds, and cash, offer different risk/return profiles and can potentially enhance portfolio diversification.⁶

Within the diverse world of alternatives, private debt has emerged as a noteworthy category. Specifically, strategies such as asset-based lending – the focus of Investor Underwriting – present a potential solution tailored to the needs of income-seeking retirees. Private debt funds aim to generate consistent income streams, often distributed as monthly cash flow, by providing loans directly to companies, bypassing public markets.⁹ Asset-based lending, in particular, secures these loans with specific collateral, offering a layer of potential downside protection.¹⁰

However, accessing these potential benefits involves important trade-offs. Alternative investments, including private debt, are typically characterized by lower liquidity, greater complexity, and often higher fees compared to their traditional counterparts traded on Wall Street.⁶ This white paper aims to provide Baby Boomers with a comprehensive understanding of alternative investments, focusing on private debt and asset-based lending. It will explore how these strategies may align with retirement income goals while offering a transparent assessment of their distinct characteristics, costs, and inherent risks, empowering investors to make informed decisions about their financial future.

2. The Retirement Income Challenge for Baby Boomers: Navigating the “Danger Zone”

The transition into retirement marks a critical financial juncture for Baby Boomers, often referred to as the “retirement danger zone” – encompassing the five years preceding retirement and the first decade within it.² During this period, individuals are typically at their peak wealth accumulation but are also most vulnerable to financial setbacks, as there is limited time and earning potential to recover from significant losses.² Decisions made during this phase can have profound and lasting impacts on financial security throughout retirement.

Widespread Savings Concerns

A primary concern haunting many Baby Boomers is the adequacy of their retirement savings. Data reveals a startling reality: a significant portion of this generation feels unprepared. According to AARP surveys, one in five Americans aged 50 and older possess no retirement savings at all.² Furthermore, nearly half (45%) acknowledge their savings are likely insufficient to maintain their desired lifestyle in retirement ¹⁶, and a staggering 61% express worry about having enough funds to last.²

Research focused on “peak boomers” (those born between 1959 and 1964) paints a similar picture. As of 2022, this group held median retirement assets of just under $225,000.³ Over half (52.5%) possess less than $250,000, indicating a heavy reliance on Social Security as their primary income source.³ Even those with assets between $250,000 and $500,000 are projected to face financial strain throughout retirement.³ Compounding this, the estimated $220,000 needed just to cover healthcare expenses for a typical 65-year-old couple in retirement underscores the potential shortfall for many.⁵ This savings gap highlights the immense pressure on retirement portfolios to generate reliable income.

The Quest for Stable Income

As Boomers transition from accumulating wealth to drawing upon it, the primary financial objective shifts decisively towards generating consistent income and preserving capital.² The fundamental need is to secure reliable income streams sufficient to cover essential living expenses – including housing, healthcare, food, transportation, and taxes – ideally shielded from the volatility of market fluctuations.²

However, traditional income sources often fall short. Social Security, while a crucial safety net, is typically designed to replace only about 40% of pre-retirement income, whereas financial advisors generally estimate retirees need 70% to 80% to maintain their lifestyle.³ With average monthly benefits around $1,976 in early 2025 (less than $24,000 annually), Social Security alone is insufficient for most.¹⁶ Furthermore, the historical decline of defined-benefit pension plans, which once provided guaranteed lifetime income for many private-sector workers, leaves a significant void for current retirees.⁵ Only about 10% of Boomer-age workers can expect income from such plans.⁵ This forces retirees to rely more heavily on their personal savings (like 401(k)s and IRAs) and investments to bridge the income gap, making the performance and stability of those assets paramount.²

Heightened Sensitivity to Market Volatility

Approaching and entering retirement naturally brings a psychological shift towards lower risk tolerance.⁴ The prospect of watching hard-earned savings diminish due to market downturns becomes particularly daunting when the timeframe for recovery is short. This period is especially vulnerable to “sequence of return risk”.¹⁵ Negative returns experienced early in retirement, coinciding with necessary withdrawals to fund living expenses, can disproportionately deplete a portfolio, a phenomenon sometimes termed “dollar-cost-ravaging”.¹⁵ Selling assets at depressed prices to generate income permanently impairs the portfolio’s ability to recover and grow, potentially jeopardizing long-term financial security.

Despite this heightened risk sensitivity, many Baby Boomer portfolios may remain aggressively positioned. Fidelity reported that over one-third of Boomers maintain equity allocations considered too high for their life stage.²⁰ This often stems from the conflicting pressures of needing portfolio growth to compensate for savings shortfalls and outpace inflation, while simultaneously desiring the safety and stability appropriate for retirement.²⁰ The anxiety of suffering daily losses, amplified by nightly news reports on market turmoil, is a tangible concern for this demographic.

Capital Preservation as Paramount

Ultimately, for Boomers in the retirement danger zone, the preservation of accumulated capital becomes a critical priority.² Having reached their peak asset levels, the potential impact of losses is magnified.² This life stage is when individuals can least afford significant portfolio declines.⁵ The focus must shift from maximizing growth to safeguarding the nest egg that needs to sustain them for the remainder of their lives.

The convergence of these factors – insufficient savings, disappearing pensions, increased longevity requiring funds to last longer ⁵, heightened sensitivity to market volatility, vulnerability to sequence risk, and the critical need for reliable income – creates a significant challenge for retiring Baby Boomers. They find themselves caught in a difficult position: needing their investments to work hard enough to fund a potentially long retirement, yet deeply fearful of the market risks inherent in traditional growth assets like equities. Traditional fixed-income investments like bonds, while generally safer than stocks, face their own challenges, including interest rate risk and potentially insufficient yields to meet income needs, especially after inflation. This specific, unmet need – for investment solutions that offer the potential for consistent income and capital preservation with less correlation to volatile public markets – sets the stage for exploring alternative investment strategies.

3. Navigating Beyond Wall Street: An Introduction to Alternative Investments

For investors seeking solutions beyond the fluctuations of the public stock and bond markets, the realm of alternative investments offers a different landscape. Understanding this terrain is the first step in evaluating its potential role in a retirement portfolio.

Defining the Landscape

Alternative investments encompass a broad category of financial assets that fall outside the conventional buckets of publicly traded stocks (equities), bonds (fixed income), and cash equivalents.⁶ These are distinct from the traditional investments readily accessible through mainstream brokerage accounts, Wall Street firms, and banks.

Common Types of Alternatives

The universe of alternatives is diverse and continues to expand. Common examples include ⁶:

• Private Equity (PE): Direct investments in private companies, often aiming to improve operations and sell for a profit.
• Venture Capital (VC): Funding provided to startups and early-stage companies with high growth potential.
• Hedge Funds: Pooled investment funds employing complex, often proprietary, strategies aiming for returns uncorrelated with broad markets.
• Private Debt: Direct lending to companies by non-bank entities (the focus of this paper).
• Real Estate: Direct ownership of properties (commercial, residential, farmland) or indirect investment through vehicles like Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs).
• Commodities: Raw materials or agricultural products like gold, oil, and corn.
• Infrastructure: Investments in essential facilities like roads, bridges, and power plants.
• Collectibles: Tangible items like art, wine, classic cars, or antiques whose value may appreciate due to rarity and demand.
• Structured Products: Complex instruments engineered to provide specific risk/return profiles.
• Cryptocurrencies: Digital assets secured by blockchain technology.

Investor Underwriting’s focus lies within the Private Debt category, specifically utilizing asset-based lending strategies.

Key Differentiating Characteristics

Alternative investments generally share several characteristics that distinguish them from traditional stocks and bonds:

• Structure: Alternatives often feature more complex investment structures and legal frameworks compared to standardized, publicly traded securities.⁶ Understanding the terms, risks, and operational mechanics can require specialized knowledge.
• Liquidity: A defining feature of most alternatives is their relative illiquidity. Unlike stocks or bonds that can often be sold quickly on public exchanges, selling an alternative investment can be difficult and time-consuming due to a limited pool of potential buyers and challenges in establishing a fair market price.⁶ This contrasts sharply with the daily liquidity offered by traditional mutual funds and Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs).²² While “liquid alternatives” – mutual funds or ETFs using alternative strategies – exist, they often come with higher fees and face questions about their ability to maintain liquidity during market crises.³¹ Funds like the one offered by Investor Underwriting typically fall into the traditional private fund structure, emphasizing the commitment to illiquidity.
• Costs & Fees: Investing in alternatives typically involves higher costs than traditional investment funds.⁶ Common fee structures include an annual management fee, calculated as a percentage of assets under management (AUM) or committed capital (often 1.5% to 2% for PE and some private debt funds), and a performance fee or carried interest, which is a share of the profits generated by the fund (typically 15% to 20% above a certain minimum return threshold, known as a hurdle rate).¹¹ These contrast with the generally lower expense ratios of traditional mutual funds and especially passively managed ETFs, which represent the total annual operating costs.³⁰ Average ETF expense ratios can be well below 0.2%, while actively managed mutual funds might average around 1% or less.³⁶ The specific fees for any private fund, including Investor Underwriting’s, are detailed in its confidential offering documents.
• Regulation & Transparency: Alternative investment funds are often subject to less direct regulatory oversight and transparency requirements compared to publicly registered mutual funds or ETFs.⁶ While they fall under the purview of regulations like the Dodd-Frank Act and oversight from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), many private funds are exempt from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940.⁶ This means they generally have fewer mandatory reporting and disclosure obligations.⁶ Recent SEC rule changes aim to increase transparency for investors in private funds regarding fees, expenses, and performance, but the level of public disclosure remains significantly lower than for traditional registered funds.⁴²
• Investor Profile: Historically, access to alternative investments was largely restricted to institutional investors (like pension funds and endowments) and high-net-worth individuals meeting specific “accredited investor” criteria (defined by the SEC based on net worth exceeding $1 million, excluding primary residence, or annual income over $200,000 individually or $300,000 jointly).⁶ These criteria reflect the investments’ complexity, higher risk profile, illiquidity, and often substantial minimum investment amounts.⁶ While some platforms and fund structures are making certain alternatives more accessible, suitability remains a key consideration, particularly for strategies involving significant illiquidity and complexity.⁷

Why Consider Alternatives?

Despite the complexities and trade-offs, investors turn to alternatives primarily for two potential benefits:

1. Diversification: Because alternatives often derive returns from sources different from public stocks and bonds, they tend to exhibit low correlation with traditional markets.⁸ Adding assets with low correlation to a portfolio can potentially reduce overall volatility and mitigate losses during public market downturns.⁶
2. Potentially Higher Returns: Some alternative strategies offer the potential for higher returns than traditional investments, although this typically comes with correspondingly higher risk.⁶ This potential stems from factors like the illiquidity premium (compensation for locking up capital), access to unique or inefficient markets, and the manager’s specialized skill in sourcing and managing investments.²⁹

The table below summarizes the key distinctions discussed:

Table 1: Traditional vs. Alternative Investments: Key Differences

Data synthesized from sources including.⁶

It is crucial to recognize that the very characteristics making alternatives potentially appealing – their unique return drivers leading to low correlation, the specialized strategies employed, and the premium earned for illiquidity – are intrinsically tied to their drawbacks. The potential for diversification and enhanced returns cannot be accessed without accepting the associated complexities, higher fees, reduced transparency, and, most significantly, the commitment of capital for extended periods due to illiquidity.⁶ This inherent linkage underscores the importance of careful consideration and due diligence when evaluating alternative investments for a retirement portfolio.

4. Deep Dive into Private Debt: A Potential Solution for Income Seekers

Among the diverse range of alternative investments, private debt (also commonly referred to as private credit) has garnered significant attention, particularly from investors seeking income and stability. This section delves into the specifics of this asset class, with a particular focus on the asset-based lending strategy employed by Investor Underwriting.

Defining Private Debt/Credit

At its core, private debt involves lending by non-bank financial institutions, typically specialized funds, directly to companies.⁹ These loans are privately negotiated between the lender (the fund) and the borrower, operating outside the realm of public bond markets or large bank syndicates. Borrowers are often small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) or companies owned by private equity firms, which may find traditional bank financing less accessible or flexible.²⁹

The private debt market experienced substantial growth following the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC). As regulatory changes prompted banks to reduce certain types of lending and focus on larger clients, private debt funds stepped in to fill the financing gap.⁹ This trend has continued, with the asset class growing significantly; projections suggest global private credit assets under management could reach $2.8 trillion by 2028.⁵⁷

Focus on Asset-Based Lending (ABL)

While private debt encompasses various strategies, Investor Underwriting concentrates on asset-based lending (ABL). ABL is distinct because the loan is secured by specific, identifiable collateral owned by the borrower.⁹ Common forms of collateral include accounts receivable (money owed by customers), inventory, machinery, equipment, real estate, or even intellectual property.¹³

This collateral-focused approach fundamentally differs from traditional corporate or cash-flow lending. In cash-flow lending (a common form of direct lending), the lender primarily assesses the borrower’s overall business performance and its ability to generate sufficient earnings (often measured by EBITDA – Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) to service the debt.⁹ While cash-flow loans are often secured by a general claim on the company’s assets, the primary source of repayment is expected to be the company’s operational profits.⁹

In contrast, the defining characteristic of ABL is that the primary driver of loan repayment is the cash flow generated directly by the pledged collateral itself.⁹ For example, if the collateral is accounts receivable, the repayment comes from the collection of those receivables; if it’s leased equipment, repayment comes from the lease payments. Lenders meticulously analyze the quality and expected cash generation profile of the specific asset pool.⁹ This focus on tangible or financial assets as the direct source of repayment can offer enhanced structural protection and potentially greater downside mitigation compared to loans relying solely on a company’s future operating performance.⁹ Often, ABL facilities are structured to be “bankruptcy-remote,” aiming to isolate the collateral from other creditors in case the borrowing company faces financial distress.⁹

Other Private Debt Strategies (Briefly)

To provide context, other common private debt strategies include:

• Direct Lending (Corporate/Cash-Flow): Loans underwritten based on a company’s overall creditworthiness and projected cash flows, often senior secured.⁹
• Mezzanine Debt: Positioned between senior debt and equity in the capital structure (subordinated), carrying higher risk and offering potentially higher returns, often including equity-like features such as warrants.²⁹
• Distressed Debt: Investing in the debt of companies facing financial difficulties or bankruptcy, often purchased at a significant discount to face value.²⁹
• Venture Debt: Providing loans to venture capital-backed startups, often alongside equity investments.⁵¹

How Private Debt Funds Operate

Understanding the operational structure of private debt funds is important for potential investors:

• Structure: Most private debt funds are organized as limited partnerships. Investors act as Limited Partners (LPs), providing capital, while the fund management firm acts as the General Partner (GP), responsible for sourcing, underwriting, and managing the loans.³⁹ These funds are typically structured to be exempt from registration as investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, relying on exemptions like Section 3(c)(1) (limited to 100 beneficial owners) or 3(c)(7) (limited to “qualified purchasers,” a higher standard than accredited investors).³⁹ Some private credit strategies are also offered through Business Development Companies (BDCs), which can be publicly traded or private and are subject to specific regulations under the 1940 Act.²⁹
• Lifecycle: The life of a typical private debt fund spans approximately 7 to 10 years ⁴⁷ and follows distinct phases:

• Fundraising: The GP secures capital commitments from LPs, typically institutional investors, family offices, and eligible high-net-worth individuals.⁴⁷
• Investment Period: The GP identifies suitable lending opportunities, performs due diligence, negotiates loan terms, and “calls” capital from LPs as needed to fund the loans.⁴⁷ This period usually lasts a few years.⁶⁵
• Harvesting Period: The GP manages the existing loan portfolio, collects interest and principal payments, handles any restructurings or defaults, and ultimately distributes proceeds back to the LPs as loans mature or are repaid.⁴⁷
• Investment Process: The GP plays an active role throughout the process. Deal sourcing often involves established relationships, particularly with private equity sponsors who require debt financing for their portfolio companies.⁵⁴ Due diligence is critical and can be resource-intensive, potentially involving hundreds of hours per deal to assess the borrower’s creditworthiness and, in the case of ABL, the quality and value of the collateral.⁵⁴ Loan terms are directly negotiated, allowing for customization.²⁹ Post-closing, the GP actively monitors the borrower’s performance and compliance with loan covenants.⁴⁴ This “originate-to-hold” approach contrasts with the traditional banking model of “originate-to-distribute,” potentially leading to a stronger alignment of interest between the GP and the LPs, as the GP manages the loan risk throughout its life.⁴⁴

For risk-averse Baby Boomers seeking clarity and security, the concept of asset-based lending within private credit may hold particular appeal. Compared to lending based on projections of future corporate earnings (cash-flow lending), the idea of securing a loan against tangible assets like equipment, real estate, or quantifiable financial assets like receivables offers a more concrete and potentially easier-to-understand source of repayment.⁵⁹ This focus on collateral provides a clearer perceived safety net.⁹ When combined with the potential for yields exceeding those of traditional bonds, ABL directly addresses the core dilemma facing many retirees: the need for stable income coupled with a strong desire for capital preservation. Emphasizing the asset-based nature of Investor Underwriting’s strategy is therefore central to its value proposition for this audience.

5. Generating Stable Income Through Private Debt: The Mechanics

A primary attraction of private debt for income-focused investors, particularly retirees, is its potential to generate regular and predictable cash flow. Understanding the mechanics behind this income generation is key to evaluating its suitability.

Primary Return Driver: Interest Income

The cornerstone of returns in private debt investing is the interest income earned on the loans extended by the fund.¹¹ Unlike equity investments where returns depend on capital appreciation, private debt is fundamentally a lending strategy. Funds generate revenue primarily through the contractually obligated interest payments made by the borrowers over the life of the loans.

Floating vs. Fixed Rates: A Key Advantage in Certain Environments

A significant feature of the private debt market, especially in direct lending and asset-based lending, is the prevalence of floating-rate loans.¹³ This means the interest rate charged to the borrower is not fixed for the loan’s entire term but adjusts periodically based on a benchmark reference rate, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), plus a predetermined credit spread (margin).

This floating-rate structure offers a distinct advantage for investors, particularly in periods of rising interest rates or heightened inflation concerns – conditions often worrying for retirees living on fixed incomes.⁴ As the benchmark rate (SOFR) increases, the interest rate on the loan adjusts upward, leading to higher interest payments received by the fund and, consequently, potentially higher income distributions to investors.²⁹ This mechanism acts as a natural hedge against rising rates and the eroding effects of inflation on purchasing power.¹⁰ This contrasts sharply with traditional fixed-rate bonds, which typically decrease in value when interest rates rise.⁵⁵ While floating rates are beneficial when rates rise, it’s also important to note that income generated could decrease if benchmark rates fall, although many loans incorporate interest rate floors to provide some downside protection.²⁹

Cash Flow Generation in Asset-Based Lending (ABL)

Asset-based lending strategies, like those employed by Investor Underwriting, are often structured specifically around collateral pools that generate consistent and predictable cash flows.⁹ Examples include:

• Equipment Leases: Regular payments from businesses leasing essential equipment.
• Accounts Receivable: Ongoing collections from a company’s customers.
• Consumer Loans: Monthly principal and interest payments from individual borrowers.
• Real Estate Leases: Rental income from tenants.

The contractual nature of these underlying payments provides a direct and often diversified source of funds to service the ABL loan extended by the fund, supporting regular distributions to investors.¹⁰ Furthermore, ABL loans are frequently structured to be amortizing, meaning the borrower makes regular payments that include both interest and a portion of the principal over the loan’s term.⁹ This gradual repayment of principal reduces the lender’s outstanding risk exposure more quickly compared to “bullet” loans where the entire principal is repaid only at maturity, a common structure in corporate direct lending.⁹

Other Return Components

While interest income is the primary driver, private debt funds can generate additional returns through various fees associated with originating and managing the loans.¹¹ These may include:

• Origination Fees: Upfront fees charged when the loan is made.
• Transaction Fees: Fees for specific services or amendments during the loan term.
• Prepayment Fees: Penalties charged if a borrower repays the loan early (though these are sometimes negotiable or waived).³⁹
• Equity Kickers: Less common in senior debt or ABL, but sometimes included in mezzanine or subordinated debt strategies, these provide potential upside through warrants or small equity stakes in the borrower.⁴⁸

Payment-in-Kind (PIK) Interest

Investors should be aware of Payment-in-Kind (PIK) interest features present in some private debt loans.³³ PIK allows the borrower to defer cash interest payments, with the accrued interest being added to the outstanding principal balance of the loan. While this provides cash flow flexibility for the borrower, it increases the lender’s risk exposure and means the investor does not receive that portion of the interest as current cash income.³³ The prevalence of PIK can vary; for instance, the Cliffwater Direct Lending Index recently reported that over 10% of the ~11% current yield was cash-paying, with less than 1% attributed to PIK.³³ Funds focused on generating current income for investors, like those targeting retirees, may prioritize loans with predominantly cash-pay interest. Investor Underwriting’s specific approach to PIK interest should be clarified in its fund documentation.

Distribution Frequency: Delivering Regular Income

A key aspect for retirees is the frequency of income distributions. Private debt funds distribute the income generated (primarily net interest received after fees and expenses) to their LPs. While traditional closed-end fund structures often distribute income and returned capital on a quarterly basis ⁶⁴, certain structures, particularly continuously offered funds like some BDCs or interval funds, are designed to make distributions more frequently, often monthly.⁵⁰ This aligns well with the regular income needs of retirees managing monthly expenses. Investor Underwriting intends for its new fund to provide monthly cash flow, a significant potential benefit for the target Baby Boomer audience. It’s important to note that distributions can sometimes be funded from sources other than operational cash flow, such as asset sales, borrowings, return of capital, or temporary fee waivers by the manager.⁵⁰

The mechanics of private debt, particularly the prevalence of floating-rate coupons in direct lending and ABL, offer a compelling narrative for Baby Boomers concerned about rising rates and inflation. The ability to potentially generate increasing income streams in such environments directly counters the risks faced by traditional fixed-income investments. When combined with structures designed for regular, potentially monthly, cash distributions, private debt presents a mechanism explicitly aimed at meeting the core income needs of retirees.

6. Performance and Volatility: Private Debt vs. Public Markets

Beyond the mechanics of income generation, investors evaluating private debt need to understand its historical performance characteristics, particularly concerning returns, volatility, and behavior during market downturns, relative to more familiar public market investments.

Historical Returns

Data from established benchmarks suggests that private debt has historically delivered attractive returns. The Cliffwater Direct Lending Index (CDLI), a widely cited benchmark primarily composed of U.S. middle market corporate loans held by BDCs, reported an annualized return of 9.5% over the 20 years ending in 2024.³³ Over the past 5, 10, and 20-year periods, the CDLI outperformed public market leveraged loans (represented by the Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan Index) by more than 4% annually.³³ Other studies show similar trends, with private credit historically outperforming high-yield bonds and leveraged loans over extended periods.⁵⁵ For example, one analysis indicated a 10.1% annualized return for private credit over 15 years, compared to 8.6% for high-yield bonds.⁷¹

These potentially higher returns are often attributed, in part, to an illiquidity premium – the excess return investors may demand for committing capital to assets that cannot be easily bought or sold.²⁹ Additionally, factors like direct origination capabilities, customized structuring, and potentially higher yields negotiated with borrowers who have fewer financing options contribute to the return profile.⁴⁸

Lower Volatility & Correlation

A key attraction for risk-averse investors is private debt’s historically lower reported volatility compared to public equities and even other credit asset classes like high-yield bonds and leveraged loans.⁵⁵ Measured by standard deviation, private credit volatility has often been closer to that of investment-grade bonds than high-yield debt or equities.⁶⁶

This lower reported volatility stems from several factors. Firstly, private debt investments are not traded daily on public exchanges. Their values are typically assessed less frequently (e.g., quarterly) using valuation models, appraisals, or broker quotes rather than constant market fluctuations.⁶ This appraisal-based methodology inherently results in smoother, less volatile reported net asset values (NAVs) compared to the daily mark-to-market pricing of public securities.⁶⁶ Secondly, the contractual nature of loan repayments and the focus on income generation contribute to more stable return streams.⁶³

Furthermore, private credit has demonstrated low correlation to traditional public markets.¹⁰ Because its returns are driven by factors largely independent of daily stock market sentiment (e.g., borrower creditworthiness, specific collateral performance), adding private debt to a portfolio containing stocks and bonds can enhance diversification and potentially reduce overall portfolio risk.¹⁰

Performance During Market Stress

Perhaps most relevant for retirees concerned about capital preservation is private debt’s track record of relative resilience during periods of significant market stress. Historical data covering downturns like the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in 2008-2009 and the COVID-19 shock in early 2020 illustrate this potential:

• GFC (2008): While the CDLI experienced its only significantly negative year (-6.5%), this decline was considerably less severe than the losses seen in high-yield bonds (-26.2%) and leveraged loans (-29.1%) during the same period.⁷⁵ Despite a spike in defaults across credit markets, senior secured loans (a core component of private credit) continued to provide relatively stable cash flows.⁶³
• COVID-19 (Q1 2020): As markets reacted sharply to the pandemic, the CDLI declined by -7.6%. In contrast, high-yield bonds fell -15.0% and the S&P 500 dropped -19.6%.⁷¹ This again highlighted the potential for private credit to offer better downside protection during sharp market dislocations.

This resilience is often attributed to the structural features common in private debt deals and the active management approach of lenders.⁴⁴

Downside Protection Mechanisms

Several features inherent in private debt, particularly senior secured and asset-based strategies, aim to protect investor capital:

• Seniority: Private debt investments are frequently structured as senior secured loans. This means they rank first in priority for repayment in the event of a borrower’s bankruptcy, ahead of subordinated debt holders and equity owners.⁴⁷ This senior position significantly increases the likelihood of recovering invested capital.
• Collateral (especially ABL): Loans are often secured by specific assets of the borrower. In ABL, this collateral is the primary source of repayment.⁹ Having claims on tangible assets provides a potential recovery path even if the borrower’s business fails. Historically, recovery rates on defaulted senior secured loans have been significantly higher than for unsecured debt (e.g., ~70% vs. ~47% according to one Moody’s study ⁶⁴), and some suggest ABL recovery rates can be even higher, potentially exceeding 95% in some cases due to the focus on liquidating specific asset pools.¹³
• Covenants: Loan agreements typically include covenants – conditions that the borrower must meet, often related to financial performance (e.g., maintaining certain leverage ratios or interest coverage levels).⁴⁴ These covenants act as early warning systems. If a borrower breaches a covenant, it gives the lender the right to intervene, renegotiate terms, demand higher interest, or potentially take control, allowing for proactive risk management before a default occurs.⁴⁴ However, it’s noted that in highly competitive lending environments, the strength and number of covenants may sometimes be weakened.⁵⁶
• Lower Loan-to-Value (LTV): Particularly in the middle market where many private debt funds operate, loans are often underwritten with lower leverage multiples (debt-to-EBITDA) or lower loan-to-value ratios compared to peak levels seen in larger, broadly syndicated loan markets.⁵⁵ This provides a larger equity cushion beneath the debt, absorbing potential declines in business value before impacting the lender’s principal.⁵⁵

The following table provides a comparative overview of historical risk and return metrics:

Table 2: Comparative Risk, Return, and Volatility (Illustrative Historical Data)

Notes: Returns and volatility are approximate long-term historical averages and can vary significantly depending on the time period measured. Sharpe Ratios compare return to risk (higher is better). Performance in downturns is illustrative of specific periods. Correlation measures how assets move relative to each other (-1 to +1). Data synthesized from sources including.³³

While the historical data paints a picture of attractive risk-adjusted returns and relative stability, it is essential to understand the nuances. The lower reported volatility of private debt is significantly influenced by its illiquidity and the nature of its valuation process.⁴¹ Unlike public securities priced continuously by the market, private loans are valued less frequently, often based on internal models or external appraisals. This inherently smooths out the reported returns and masks the day-to-day volatility experienced in public markets.⁶⁶ While this smoothing effect might be psychologically comforting, it does not eliminate the underlying economic risks faced by the borrowers.²⁹ Real risk in private debt manifests less through daily price swings and more through potential credit events – defaults or impairments that lead to realized losses, typically recognized when they occur or upon the loan’s exit.⁵⁵ Therefore, while the lower headline volatility is appealing, investors must recognize it reflects valuation mechanics as much as fundamental risk reduction.

7. Understanding the Risks and Considerations: A Transparent View

While private debt, particularly asset-based lending, offers potential benefits for income-seeking retirees, it is imperative to approach this asset class with a clear understanding of the associated risks and considerations. Transparency regarding these factors is crucial for making informed investment decisions.

Illiquidity: The Primary Trade-Off

The most significant difference between private debt funds and traditional investments like stocks or mutual funds is liquidity.⁶ Private debt investments are inherently illiquid. Investors typically commit capital to a fund for a fixed term, often lasting 7 to 10 years or longer, during which access to that capital is restricted.⁴⁷ Unlike mutual funds or ETFs that can usually be bought or sold daily ²², private debt funds offer limited opportunities for investors to redeem their shares. Some structures, like BDCs or interval funds, may offer periodic repurchase options (e.g., quarterly tender offers), but these are often limited in size (e.g., up to 5% of outstanding shares per quarter), subject to available liquidity within the fund, and not guaranteed.⁴² A secondary market for trading LP interests exists but is relatively small, opaque, and selling may require significant discounts to the reported Net Asset Value (NAV), especially during times of market stress.⁴¹ Therefore, an investment in private debt should be considered a long-term commitment, suitable only for capital that investors do not anticipate needing access to for the duration of the fund’s life.⁷

Credit Risk (Default Risk)

Private debt funds generate returns by lending money, and inherent in any lending activity is credit risk – the risk that the borrower will be unable to meet its repayment obligations (interest or principal), resulting in a default.²⁹ While structural protections like seniority and collateral aim to mitigate losses in the event of default ⁶³, losses can still occur. Historical average annual loss rates for direct lending indices have been around 1%, though they can spike significantly during severe economic downturns (e.g., losses neared 7% in 2009 for some indices).³³ Borrowers in the private debt market may include smaller or middle-market companies that could be perceived as inherently riskier than large, publicly traded corporations with access to broader capital markets.⁴⁴ The expertise of the fund manager in underwriting (assessing borrower risk), structuring loans defensively, and actively monitoring portfolio companies post-investment is therefore critical to managing credit risk.⁴⁴

Valuation Challenges

Determining the precise value of illiquid private debt assets presents unique challenges.⁶ Unlike publicly traded securities with readily available market prices, private loans must be valued using other methods, such as discounted cash flow models, comparisons to similar (though often imperfect) public market instruments, broker quotes (which may be indicative rather than executable), or third-party appraisal services.⁴¹ This process involves assumptions and manager judgment, introducing a degree of subjectivity.⁶⁹ The lack of transparency into underlying loan performance and borrower health can further complicate accurate valuation.⁴¹ Potential conflicts of interest can also arise, as fund managers’ fees are often calculated based on the fund’s NAV, creating a possible incentive to maintain higher valuations.⁴¹ Regulatory bodies like the SEC are increasingly scrutinizing valuation practices in private markets, emphasizing the need for robust policies, procedures, and independent oversight.⁴² While diversification across many loans within a fund can help mitigate the impact of valuation errors on any single loan ⁷⁶, investors should be aware that reported NAVs are estimates and may not reflect the price achievable in an immediate sale.

Regulatory Landscape & Transparency

As previously noted, private funds generally operate under a different, often lighter, regulatory framework than registered mutual funds.⁶ They typically rely on exemptions from Investment Company Act registration ³⁹ and primarily offer securities to accredited investors or qualified purchasers.⁶ While advisers to private funds are usually registered with the SEC (unless exempt) and subject to fiduciary duties and anti-fraud provisions ⁴⁰, the level of mandated public disclosure regarding portfolio holdings, detailed performance attribution, and operational activities is significantly lower than for mutual funds.⁶ The SEC has recently implemented new rules for registered private fund advisers aimed at enhancing transparency and governance, covering areas like quarterly statements, mandatory audits, fee and expense disclosures, restrictions on certain activities, and rules around preferential treatment offered to specific investors.⁴³ While these rules represent a step towards greater investor protection ⁴³, the private nature of the underlying investments means the asset class remains inherently less transparent than public markets.⁴¹

Fees and Costs

Investing in private debt typically involves higher fees compared to traditional low-cost ETFs or mutual funds.⁶ Investors should expect to pay an annual management fee based on committed capital or NAV (often 1.5% to 2%) and potentially a performance fee or carried interest (typically 15% to 20% of profits above a hurdle rate).¹¹ These fees compensate the manager for their specialized expertise in sourcing, underwriting, and managing illiquid loans, but they directly reduce the net returns ultimately received by investors.³⁵ A thorough review of the fund’s offering documents is necessary to understand the specific fee structure and its potential impact on performance.

Complexity

Alternative investments, by their nature, are generally more complex than standard stocks and bonds.⁶ Understanding the specific strategy (e.g., ABL vs. cash-flow lending), the fund structure, the loan terms, the valuation methodology, and the associated risks requires careful study and due diligence on the part of the investor or their advisor.

Market & Cyclical Risk

While private debt may exhibit low correlation to public markets day-to-day, the underlying borrowers are not immune to broader economic downturns.²⁹ A recession can negatively impact borrower revenues and profitability, potentially increasing default rates across the portfolio. Furthermore, the private credit market has grown exponentially since the last severe, prolonged recession (the GFC), meaning its performance at its current scale and interconnectedness has not yet been fully tested under such conditions.⁵⁶

Acknowledging these risks is not meant to dissuade potential investors but rather to provide a balanced perspective. The potential benefits of private debt – consistent income, capital preservation, diversification – are pursued in exchange for accepting these inherent characteristics, most notably illiquidity and complexity. The evolving regulatory focus ⁴³ may offer some comfort regarding increased transparency and standardized practices over time, but the fundamental nature of private market investing remains distinct from public markets.

8. Asset-Based Lending in Practice: Illustrative Examples of Stability and Income

To better understand how asset-based lending (ABL) strategies within private debt aim to achieve the goals of stable income and capital preservation sought by retiring Baby Boomers, consider these generalized examples based on common ABL structures:

Example 1: Financing an Equipment Leasing Portfolio

• Scenario: A private debt fund provides a loan to a company that leases essential business equipment (e.g., construction machinery, medical devices, IT hardware) to a diverse range of end-users across various industries.
• Collateral: The loan is secured by the pool of equipment leases and the underlying physical equipment itself.⁹
• Income Generation: The fund receives regular interest and principal payments derived directly from the consistent stream of lease payments made by the end-users to the leasing company.¹⁰ Because the lease payments are contractual obligations from multiple businesses, the cash flow supporting the fund’s loan is diversified and less dependent on the fortunes of any single company.⁵⁸ These incoming cash flows enable the fund to make regular (potentially monthly) distributions to its investors.⁵⁰
• Downside Protection: The physical equipment serves as hard collateral. If the leasing company defaults on its loan to the fund, or if underlying lessees default, the fund has a claim on the equipment, which can potentially be recovered and sold or re-leased to recoup value.¹⁰ The value of this tangible collateral provides a buffer against losses.
• Stability: The performance of the loan is tied primarily to the payment history of the underlying lessees and the residual value of the equipment, factors that tend to have low correlation with daily fluctuations in the stock or bond markets.⁹

Example 2: Accounts Receivable (AR) Financing

• Scenario: A fund provides a revolving line of credit or term loan to a manufacturing or distribution company, secured by its outstanding accounts receivable (invoices owed by its customers).
• Collateral: The loan is secured by the pool of the company’s receivables.¹³ The lender typically lends a percentage of the value of eligible receivables (e.g., those less than 90 days old).
• Income Generation: As the company’s customers pay their invoices, the cash collected flows directly or indirectly to repay the fund’s loan, generating interest income for the fund and its investors.¹³ The predictable, albeit cyclical, nature of AR collections from a diversified customer base supports consistent cash flow.⁵⁸
• Downside Protection: The value lies in the collectability of the receivables. The fund carefully analyzes the credit quality of the borrower’s customer base and the historical collection performance. If the borrower defaults, the fund has a primary claim on the incoming cash from customer payments.⁵⁹ The short-term nature of most receivables also means the duration risk for the lender is relatively low.¹²
• Stability: The loan’s performance depends more on the payment behavior of the borrower’s customers and the borrower’s operational efficiency in managing receivables than on broad market sentiment.

Example 3: Financing a Portfolio of Consumer Loans (Indirect)

• Scenario: A private debt fund provides financing to, or purchases a portfolio of loans from, a financial technology (fintech) company or other originator that makes consumer loans (e.g., personal loans, auto loans, point-of-sale financing).
• Collateral: The loan is secured by the large, diversified pool of underlying consumer loans.⁹
• Income Generation: The fund receives interest and principal payments derived from the aggregated monthly payments made by thousands of individual consumer borrowers within the portfolio.¹⁰ This high degree of granularity diversifies the risk; the default of a small number of individual borrowers has a limited impact on the overall pool’s cash flow.⁵⁸
• Downside Protection: Protection comes from the diversification across numerous borrowers, the underwriting standards applied by the originator (e.g., credit score checks, income verification), and potentially structural enhancements like overcollateralization (where the value of the loan pool exceeds the financing provided by the fund).⁹ The fund performs diligence on the originator’s underwriting processes and servicing capabilities.
• Stability: While consumer credit carries inherent risk, the performance of a large, diversified pool is often statistically predictable and less correlated with corporate credit cycles or equity market movements.⁵⁸ The potential for higher yields reflects the underlying consumer credit risk, balanced by the diversification benefits.⁵⁸

Connecting to Investor Underwriting

These examples illustrate the core principles of asset-based lending that Investor Underwriting employs. By focusing on loans secured by specific, often cash-generating assets, and applying a disciplined approach to originating, underwriting, and servicing each loan, the objective is to generate stable, predictable returns with potentially limited downside risk [User Query]. The granularity often found in ABL strategies – lending against pools of numerous individual assets like leases, receivables, or consumer loans – provides a distinct form of risk mitigation through diversification, differing from the single-company concentration risk inherent in much corporate lending.¹⁰ This focus on asset-backed security and diversified cash flows directly supports the goal of providing consistent monthly income and preserving capital for investors like Baby Boomers navigating retirement.

Across these examples, the key attributes relevant to retirees are consistently emphasized: income derived from contractual cash flows ¹⁰, tangible or financial asset collateral providing security ¹⁰, diversification within the underlying asset pools ⁵⁸, the potential for regular (monthly or quarterly) distributions ⁵⁰, lower correlation to volatile public markets ⁹, and an overarching focus on capital preservation through careful structuring and underwriting.¹²

9. Conclusion: Aligning Private Debt with Baby Boomer Retirement Goals

The financial anxieties facing Baby Boomers in or nearing retirement are significant and valid. The convergence of savings shortfalls, the decline of traditional pensions, increased longevity, and heightened sensitivity to public market volatility creates a pressing need for investment solutions that prioritize stable income generation and capital preservation. While traditional stocks and bonds remain core portfolio components, their limitations in the current environment warrant consideration of alternatives.

This analysis suggests that private debt, particularly strategies focused on asset-based lending (ABL), may offer characteristics that align well with the specific objectives of many retiring Boomers:

• Potential for Stable Income: Private debt funds, especially those utilizing ABL secured by cash-flowing assets, are designed to generate regular income streams primarily through contractual interest payments.¹⁰ The prevalence of floating-rate loans can provide a valuable hedge against inflation and rising interest rates, potentially allowing income to grow in environments where traditional fixed-income assets struggle.²⁹ Fund structures offering monthly distributions further cater to the regular cash flow needs of retirees.⁵⁰
• Focus on Capital Preservation: The emphasis on senior secured positions, lending against tangible or financial collateral (especially in ABL), the inclusion of protective covenants, and rigorous underwriting processes employed by experienced managers are all mechanisms aimed at mitigating downside risk and preserving investor capital.⁹ Historically, private credit has demonstrated resilience during market downturns compared to more volatile asset classes.⁷¹
• Reduced Correlation to Public Markets: By deriving returns from sources largely independent of daily stock and bond market movements, private debt can offer valuable diversification benefits, potentially smoothing overall portfolio returns and reducing exposure to Wall Street’s volatility.¹⁰

However, accessing these potential benefits requires acknowledging and accepting significant trade-offs inherent in the asset class. The most critical considerations are:

• Illiquidity: Private debt is a long-term, illiquid investment. Capital is typically locked up for many years with limited or no options for early withdrawal.⁶
• Complexity: These investments involve intricate structures, strategies, and risks that require careful understanding and due diligence.⁶
• Costs: Fees associated with private debt funds are generally higher than those for traditional mutual funds or ETFs.⁶
• Transparency: While improving due to regulatory changes, the level of transparency remains lower than in public markets.⁴¹

These factors should not be viewed merely as risks, but as the intrinsic characteristics investors accept in exchange for the potential rewards of accessing the illiquidity premium and unique return streams offered by private markets.

Private debt should not be considered a replacement for a diversified portfolio but rather as a potential component within one.⁶ Its suitability depends entirely on an individual investor’s specific financial situation, income needs, time horizon, liquidity requirements, and tolerance for risk and complexity. Prospective investors should carefully review all fund documentation and are strongly encouraged to consult with a qualified financial advisor to determine if an allocation to private debt aligns with their overall retirement plan.¹⁷

Investor Underwriting, through its focus on disciplined, asset-based lending, aims to provide investors with high-yield opportunities characterized by limited downside risk, generating the stable and predictable returns sought for a secure financial future. For accredited investors seeking alternatives to public market volatility and prioritizing consistent income and capital preservation, exploring the specifics of Investor Underwriting’s forthcoming private debt fund may be a worthwhile endeavor.

Works cited

1. Will Selling Your House Secure Your Retirement? – AARP, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.aarp.org/money/personal-finance/should-you-sell-house-to-fund-retirement/
2. Baby boomers and the retirement danger zone – TruStage, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.trustage.com/business-solutions/annuities/blog/baby-boomer-retirement-danger-zone
3. Peak Boomers Face Retirement Finance Challenges – AARP, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.aarp.org/money/retirement/peak-boomer-readiness/
4. Seeking downside protection for investors at or near retirement age – TruStage, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.trustage.com/business-solutions/annuities/blog/downside-protection-for-baby-boomers-near-retirement
5. Boomers Face Savings Reality, Working Retirement – AARP, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.aarp.org/work/retirement-planning/info-2014/boomer-retirement-little-savings-means-working.html
6. What Are Alternative Investments? Definition and Examples, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/alternative_investment.asp
7. How to Buy Alternative Investments – Investopedia, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/how-to-buy-alternative-investments-7369694
8. What Are Alternative Investments? Types, Pros & Cons – IMD Business School, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.imd.org/blog/management/alternative-investments/
9. A Primer on Asset-Based Private Credit – Castlelake, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.castlelake.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Asset-Based-Private-Credit-Whitepaper_April-2024.pdf
10. What is Asset-Based Finance? Discover How Asset-Based Lending Works in This Investor’s Guide | PIMCO, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.pimco.com/sg/en/investment-strategies/asset-based-lending
11. Private Equity vs Private Credit: Key Differences Explained, accessed April 10, 2025, https://growthequityinterviewguide.com/private-equity/private-equity-primer/private-equity-vs-private-credit
12. ASSET-BASED PRIVATE CREDIT MOVES INTO THE SPOTLIGHT – Monroe Capital LLC, accessed April 10, 2025, https://monroecap.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Pensions-Investments-Asset-Based-Private-Credit-Report-11.18.24.pdf
13. A Deep Dive into Private Debt: One of the Fastest-Growing Asset Classes, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.foundationendowmentsummit.com/private-debt-investing/
14. The Pros and Cons of Alternative Investments – Investopedia, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-advisors/092515/alternative-investments-look-pros-cons.asp
15. Little-Known Risk Threatens Baby Boomers Golden Years | PLANADVISER, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.planadviser.com/exclusives/little-known-risk-threatens-baby-boomers-golden-years/
16. What Baby Boomers’ Financial Divide Means for the Senior Living Industry – myLifeSite, accessed April 10, 2025, https://mylifesite.net/blog/post/what-baby-boomers-retirement-savings-means-for-the-senior-living-industry/
17. Six Essential Retirement Strategies for Baby Boomers | NYSUT, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.nysut.org/-/media/files/mb-nysut/pdfs/financial-learning-center/ktodayboomerstrategiesjune.pdf
18. Six Essential Retirement Strategies for Baby Boomers – Kiplinger, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.kiplinger.com/retirement/baby-boomers-retirement-strategies
19. What Retirement Looks Like For Boomers Turning 65 – AARP, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.aarp.org/money/retirement/silver-tsunami-late-boomers-turn-65/
20. Retirement Savings: Why Baby Boomer Portfolios Are Too Risky …, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/retirement-savings:-why-baby-boomer-portfolios-are-too-risky-and-what-to-do-about-it
21. The Surprising Role Alternative Investments Play in Portfolio Diversification – Investopedia, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/how-to-diversify-portfolio-with-alternatives-8779439
22. Investing Explained: Types of Investments and How to Get Started – Investopedia, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/investing.asp
23. Alternative Investments: A Complete Guide | Clearwater Analytics, accessed April 10, 2025, https://clearwateranalytics.com/dictionary/alternative-investments-a-complete-guide/
24. 7 Types of Alternative Investments Everyone Should Know – HBS Online, accessed April 10, 2025, https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/types-of-alternative-investments
25. 8 Types of Alternative Investments | OurCrowd, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.ourcrowd.com/learn/types-of-alternative-investments
26. What Are Alternative Investments? – Goldman Sachs, accessed April 10, 2025, https://privatewealth.goldmansachs.com/us/en/inthelead/inthelead-read/what-are-alternative-investments1
27. Alternative investments, explained | Example and strategies – Wealthsimple, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.wealthsimple.com/en-ca/learn/guide-to-alternative-investments
28. 10 Popular Types Of Alternative Investments – Bankrate, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/investing/types-of-alternative-investments/
29. What Is Private Credit? And Why Investors Are Paying Attention, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/insights/what-is-private-credit-and-why-investors-are-paying-attention
30. ETF vs. Mutual Fund: What’s the Difference? | U.S. Bank, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.usbank.com/investing/financial-perspectives/investing-insights/etfs-vs-mutual-fund.html
31. Liquid Alternatives: Definition, Purposes, Risks, and Examples – Investopedia, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/liquid-alternatives.asp
32. Management fees vs. performance fees: What’s the difference and why it matters | Saxo, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.home.saxo/learn/guides/pricing/management-fees-vs-performance-fees-whats-the-difference-and-why-it-matters
33. Another Strong Year for Private Debt – Cliffwater, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.cliffwater.com/ResourceArticle/settling-the-upper-v-lower-middle-market-lending-debate
34. Insights – Cliffwater, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.cliffwater.com/Insights
35. Management Fee vs. Expense Ratio: What’s the Difference? – Investopedia, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/062113/mutual-funds-management-fees-vs-mer.asp
36. Differences Between Management Fees and Expense Ratios – SmartAsset, accessed April 10, 2025, https://smartasset.com/investing/management-fee-vs-expense-ratio
37. Mutual Fund Fees: Average Expense Ratio and More – NerdWallet, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/investing/mutual-fund-fees-what-investors-need-to-know
38. Bond ETFs vs Bond Mutual Funds: Save With ETFs – State Street Global Advisors, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/insights/how-to-save-more-with-lower-fee-bond-etfs
39. Important Information about Private Credit Funds – Baird Wealth, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.bairdwealth.com/globalassets/pdfs/help/private-credit-funds-disclosure.pdf
40. Private Funds – SEC.gov, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/resources-small-businesses/capital-raising-building-blocks/private-funds
41. Challenges for private credit funds in a volatile market: opacity, illiquidity and litigation risks, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.hausfeld.com/en-us/what-we-think/perspectives-blogs/challenges-for-private-credit-funds-in-a-volatile-market-opacity-illiquidity-and-litigation-risks/
42. Unlocking Retail Access to Private Funds: Navigating Complex Regulations – Kroll, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.kroll.com/en/insights/publications/financial-compliance-regulation/unlocking-retail-access-private-funds
43. Understanding the New SEC Private Fund Rules, accessed April 10, 2025, https://aaplonline.com/articles/compliance/understanding-the-new-sec-private-fund-rules/
44. Temporarily Terrified by Thomas: Remarks on Private Credit – SEC.gov, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/peirce-remarks-private-credit-forum-101524
45. Navigating Transparency and Regulatory Challenges in Private Credit – Stout, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.stout.com/en/insights/commentary/navigating-transparency-regulatory-challenges-private-credit
46. Private credit draws enthusiasm, scrutiny – Regulatory Compliance Watch, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.regcompliancewatch.com/private-credit-draws-enthusiasm-scrutiny/
47. What Is Private Debt? | Allvue Systems, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.allvuesystems.com/resources/what-is-private-debt/
48. Investing in Private Debt – Guggenheim Investments, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.guggenheiminvestments.com/perspectives/portfolio-strategy/investing-in-private-debt
49. Navigating the future of private capital performance – Preqin, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.preqin.com/insights/research/blogs/navigating-the-future-of-private-capital-performance
50. Investor Services FAQs – BCRED – Blackstone Private Credit Fund, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.bcred.com/investor-services-faqs/
51. Private debt | Natixis Investment Managers, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.im.natixis.com/en-intl/investments/private-assets/private-assets-training-academy/asset-class-101/private-debt
52. Lesson 4.3: Private Debt | Preqin Academy, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.preqin.com/academy/lesson-4-asset-class-101s/private-debt
53. Everything about private debt: characteristics, advantages and ways to invest – Crescenta, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.crescenta.com/en/learn/learn-and-grow/private-debt-characteristics-advantages-ways-invest
54. A Survey of Private Debt Funds – The University of Chicago, accessed April 10, 2025, https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/BFI_WP_2023-10.pdf
55. White Paper: Why Private Credit? – Stellus Capital Management, LLC, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.stelluscapital.com/insight/white-paper-why-private-credit/
56. Global Financial Stability Report, April 2024, Chapter 2: “The Rise and Risks of Private Credit,” April 16, 2024, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/GFSR/2024/April/English/ch2.ashx
57. Valuation Considerations in Private Debt, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.ivsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/2024.10.24-KEC_Valuation-Considerations-in-Private-Debt-Final.pdf
58. Asset-Based Finance: A Fast-Growing Frontier in Private Credit | KKR, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.kkr.com/content/dam/kkr/insights/pdf/asset-based-finance-a-fast-growing-frontier-in-private-credit.pdf
59. What is Asset-Based Lending (ABL) & How Does it Work – BofA Securities – Bank of America, accessed April 10, 2025, https://business.bofa.com/en-us/content/what-is-asset-based-lending-how-it-works.html
60. What Is Asset-Based Lending? How Loans Work, Example and Types, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/assetbasedlending.asp
61. A Primer on Asset-Based Private Credit – Castlelake, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.castlelake.com/article/a-primer-on-asset-based-private-credit/
62. The growth of asset-based finance in private credit markets | Macfarlanes Private Capital Solutions, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.privatecapitalsolutions.com/insights/the-growth-of-asset-based-finance-in-private-credit-markets
63. Private Credit: An alternative asset class to boost yields, lower volatility and diversify portfolios – Invesco, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.invesco.com/apac/en/institutional/insights/fixed-income/private-credit-alternative-asset-class-boost-yields-lower-volatility-diversify-portfolios.html
64. Private Credit Strategies: An Introduction – Cambridge Associates, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.cambridgeassociates.com/insight/private-credit-strategies-introduction/
65. Private Debt Fund Returns, Persistence, and Market Conditions – Tilburg University, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/sites/default/files/download/B%C3%B6ni_Manigart_2022_Private%20Debt%20Fund%20Returns_Persistence_and%20Market%20Conditions.pdf
66. What is Private Credit, and Why Middle Market Direct Lending?, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.ncpers.org/files/Conference%20Docs/PATS/2023/Private%20Credit_Angelo%20Gordon_Sunday.pdf
67. Third Quarter 2024 Private Capital Quarterly Review – FEG Investment Advisors, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.feg.com/insights/third-quarter-2024-private-capital-quarterly
68. Private debt: How much is too much in a credit portfolio? – Moody’s, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.moodys.com/web/en/us/insights/portfolio-management/private-debt-how-much-is-too-much-in-a-credit-portfolio.html
69. Addressing Valuation Challenges in the Expanding Private Credit Market – Ankura Insights, accessed April 10, 2025, https://angle.ankura.com/post/102jm31/addressing-valuation-challenges-in-the-expanding-private-credit-market
70. Quarterly Reporting Standards – Institutional Limited Partners Association, accessed April 10, 2025, https://ilpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/ILPA-Best-Practices-Quarterly-Reporting-Standards_Version-1.1.pdf
71. The Rise of Private Credit – AAM Company, accessed April 10, 2025, https://aamcompany.com/insight/the-rise-of-private-credit/
72. Direct Lending Evolution: Driving Force of Private Credit Market | Morgan Stanley, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.morganstanley.com/im/en-us/individual-investor/insights/articles/evolution-of-direct-lending.html
73. Essentials of Private Credit – Blackstone, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.blackstone.com/pws/essentials-of-private-credit/
74. A systematic approach to private debt allocation in institutional portfolios | StepStone Group, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.stepstonegroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/A-systematic-approach-to-private-debt-allocation-in-institutional-portfolios.pdf
75. Private Credit: Opportunity Rising – Brookfield Oaktree Wealth Solutions, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.brookfieldoaktree.com/sites/default/files/2024-05/private-credit-opportunity-rising.pdf
76. Valuation and Private Debt | Portfolio for the Future – CAIA Association, accessed April 10, 2025, https://caia.org/blog/2024/10/01/valuation-and-private-debt
77. Client case study: Private investments strategy, accessed April 10, 2025, https://russellinvestments.com/-/media/files/us/institutions/case-studies/private-investments-strategy-endowment.pdf?la=en&hash=25993855AD7474753C9DB693B4E0E12A4A95BDDB
78. Private Credit: An alternative asset class to boost yields, lower volatility and diversify portfolios – Invesco, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.invesco.com/uk/en/insights/private-credit-alternative-asset-class-boost-yields-lower-volatility-diversify-portfolios.html
79. The Fed – Private Credit: Characteristics and Risks – Federal Reserve Board, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/private-credit-characteristics-and-risks-20240223.html
80. The rise of the first-out asset-based lending product – Private Debt Investor, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.privatedebtinvestor.com/the-rise-of-the-first-out-abl-product/
81. Understanding private debt secondaries | Allianz Global Investors, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.allianzgi.com/en/insights/outlook-and-commentary/understanding-private-debt-secondaries
82. Overcoming Valuation Obstacles in Private Equity and Private Credit – Waystone, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.waystone.com/overcoming-valuation-obstacles-in-private-equity-and-private-credit/
83. FCA Findings on Private Market Valuations Stress Risk of Conflicts and Need for Independence | Insights | Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2025/03/fca-findings-on-private-market-valuations
84. NAV Lending Regulatory Considerations | ACA Group, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.acaglobal.com/insights/nav-lending-regulatory-considerations
85. PDI Interview with Fran Beyers – Cliffwater, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.cliffwater.com/resourcearticle/settling-the-upper-v-lower-middle-market-lending-debateDirect