Navigating Supplemental Income Opportunities for Georgia Real Estate Brokerages Amidst Commission Structure Changes: Hard Money Lending Referrals and Brokering

1. Executive Summary

The recent settlement involving the National Association of REALTORS® (NAR) is poised to reshape the traditional commission structures within the residential real estate industry, prompting brokerages to explore alternative revenue streams. This report analyzes the viability and regulatory implications for a Georgia-licensed real estate brokerage, specifically one based in Atlanta serving seasoned real estate investors, to generate supplemental income through activities related to hard money lending for non-owner occupied, fix-and-flip properties. It examines Georgia state laws (including the Georgia Residential Mortgage Act and Georgia Real Estate Commission rules), federal regulations (primarily the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act), and practical considerations associated with three potential compensation models: a flat referral fee, a percentage of the lender’s origination fee, and a percentage of the loan amount (acting as a hard money broker). Furthermore, it assesses the feasibility of establishing a joint venture with a hard money lender. Key findings indicate that while opportunities exist, they are accompanied by significant regulatory compliance obligations, particularly concerning mortgage loan originator licensing under Georgia law, mandatory client disclosures, potential conflicts of interest, and the need for appropriate Errors & Omissions insurance coverage. A carefully considered, compliance-focused approach is paramount for successfully and legally integrating these activities.

2. The Changing Commission Landscape: NAR Settlement Impact

The recent NAR settlement agreement, stemming from class-action lawsuits alleging anti-competitive practices related to commission structures ¹, introduces significant changes effective August 17, 2024.¹ While commissions have always been negotiable ², the settlement mandates key practice changes aimed at increasing transparency and competition.⁵

The most impactful change prohibits listing agents or sellers from making offers of buyer agent compensation via NAR-affiliated Multiple Listing Services (MLS).¹ MLS platforms must remove fields displaying buyer agent commission offers.¹ While sellers can still offer compensation off-MLS (e.g., through agent websites, direct negotiation, or potentially structured as seller concessions towards closing costs) ⁴, the previous near-certainty of how buyer agents would be paid via the MLS is gone.⁴ This shifts the onus of negotiating buyer agent compensation directly onto buyers and their agents.⁵

Furthermore, buyer agents must now enter into written agreements with buyers before touring homes (excluding initial consultations or open houses).² These agreements must clearly state the agent’s compensation (amount or rate, not open-ended) and prohibit the agent from receiving compensation exceeding the agreed-upon amount from any source.² Agents must also explicitly communicate that commissions are negotiable and not set by law.²

While some predict a “buy-side price war” leading to lower costs for consumers ⁷, the immediate impact appears more nuanced. Early data suggests buyer-agent commissions have not drastically changed, with many sellers still offering compensation off-MLS, often around 2.5% or higher.³ However, the process has become more complex, requiring explicit negotiation of buyer agent fees in every transaction.⁴ This uncertainty, coupled with the fact that buyers currently cannot roll commission costs into their mortgages under the new rules ⁷, creates pressure on buyer agent compensation and necessitates brokerages exploring supplemental income streams, particularly for those serving price-sensitive buyers or facing potential commission compression. For brokerages like the one in question, whose clients include seasoned investors potentially less reliant on traditional buyer agent services for financing aspects, diversifying income becomes a prudent strategic response.

3. Georgia Regulatory Framework: Licensing and Disclosure

Engaging in activities related to mortgage financing, even for business-purpose loans on non-owner-occupied properties, subjects a Georgia real estate brokerage and its agents to state-level regulations enforced by the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance (DBF) and the Georgia Real Estate Commission (GREC).

3.1. Georgia Department of Banking and Finance (DBF) Oversight

The DBF oversees mortgage brokers, lenders, and loan originators under the Georgia Residential Mortgage Act (GRMA), O.C.G.A. § 7-1-1000 et seq..⁹ This Act aims to ensure entities and individuals involved in residential mortgage transactions meet specific standards of conduct and financial responsibility.¹⁰

3.2. Mortgage Loan Originator (MLO) Licensing Requirements

A critical consideration is whether the proposed activities require individuals (agents) associated with the brokerage to obtain a Mortgage Loan Originator (MLO) license from the DBF.

• Definition of MLO: GRMA defines an MLO as an individual who, for compensation or gain (or the expectation thereof), takes a residential mortgage loan application or offers or negotiates terms of a residential mortgage loan.⁹
• “Residential Mortgage Loan” Definition: GRMA defines a “residential mortgage loan” as a loan primarily for personal, family, or household use secured by a dwelling or residential real estate.⁹ However, the broader definition of “mortgage loan” under GRMA includes loans to a natural person secured by 1-to-4 family residential property, regardless of purpose.¹² Furthermore, DBF guidance suggests a Mortgage Lender/Broker license is required for making or brokering commercial mortgage loans if extended to a natural person and secured by 1-4 family residential property.¹⁵ This creates ambiguity regarding business-purpose loans. Given that fix-and-flip loans are often made to individual investors (natural persons) and are secured by 1-4 unit residential properties, activities involving negotiating terms or receiving compensation tied directly to the loan origination likely fall under DBF scrutiny and MLO licensing requirements, even if the loan’s purpose is business.¹⁶ A conservative approach assumes MLO licensing is required for activities beyond simple referral for a flat fee not tied to loan terms.
• MLO Licensing Process: Obtaining an MLO license involves completing 20 hours of NMLS-approved pre-licensing education (PE), passing the National SAFE MLO Test, undergoing criminal background and credit checks, paying associated fees (approx. $181-$200 initial cost plus PE course fees), and being sponsored by a Georgia-licensed mortgage company.⁹ Annual continuing education (8 hours, including 1 hour Georgia-specific) is required for renewal.¹⁸ Pre-licensing education expires if a license isn’t obtained within three years.¹⁸

3.3. Exemption for Real Estate Licensees (O.C.G.A. § 7-1-1001(6))

GRMA provides a limited exemption from MLO licensing for Georgia-licensed real estate brokers and salespersons.¹⁶

• Scope of Exemption: This exemption applies only if the licensee is not actively engaged in the business of negotiating mortgage loans.¹⁶ Providing factual information about a property to a lender (e.g., in a short sale context) or advising a consumer on general loan types (FHA, VA, etc.) without directing them to a specific loan or negotiating terms is generally permissible under this exemption.¹⁶ A salesperson can provide short sale information without a separate fee.¹⁷
• Limitations: The exemption explicitly does not cover activities such as negotiating loan terms, placing loans (finding a specific loan for a consumer), or making mortgage decisions on behalf of a consumer.¹⁶ Receiving compensation directly tied to the successful negotiation or placement of a mortgage loan strongly indicates active engagement that falls outside this narrow exemption and would necessitate an MLO license.¹⁷ The structure and nature of the compensation are critical; fees tied to loan origination or loan amounts are highly likely to disqualify a licensee from the exemption.

The practical implication is that merely referring a client to a lender for a flat fee might fall under the exemption, although this carries interpretative risk with the DBF. However, receiving compensation based on the loan’s origination fee or the loan amount itself almost certainly constitutes being “actively engaged” and requires an MLO license.

3.4. Georgia Real Estate Commission (GREC) Rules: Disclosure and Conduct

Even if MLO licensing is not required (e.g., for a simple flat-fee referral model), GREC rules impose specific obligations on real estate licensees involved in referrals.

• Mandatory Disclosure of Referral Fees: GREC License Law O.C.G.A. § 43-40-25(b)(6)(C) designates it an Unfair Trade Practice (UTP) for a licensee to fail to disclose in writing to a principal (client) the receipt of anything of value for the referral of any service or product in a real estate transaction.²³ This explicitly applies to referrals for non-brokerage services like mortgage brokers.²³ The disclosure must be made in writing before or at the time the referral occurs.²⁴ While the specific amount of the referral fee does not need to be disclosed to the client under this rule, the fact that compensation is being received must be.²³ Failure to make this written disclosure can result in disciplinary action from GREC.²³
• Prohibition on Paying Unlicensed Persons: Licensees are prohibited from paying a commission or compensation to any unlicensed person for performing services requiring a real estate license (O.C.G.A. § 43-40-25(b)(17)).²⁵ This reinforces that referral fees related to real estate activities can generally only be paid between licensed brokers/agents.
• Written Agreement for Broker Referrals: UTP #36 requires obtaining a person’s written agreement before referring them to another licensed Broker for brokerage or relocation services, including disclosure of whether compensation will be received.²³ While distinct from referrals to non-brokerage service providers like lenders, it underscores GREC’s emphasis on written agreements and disclosure for referrals involving compensation.

A critical point arises from the interaction between state and federal rules. Even if a transaction is exempt from the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) due to its business purpose (see Section 4.2), GREC rules still mandate written disclosure to the client if the brokerage or agent receives any compensation for referring them to a mortgage lender.²³ Compliance with RESPA exemptions does not negate the need to comply with Georgia’s specific disclosure requirements.

Furthermore, the requirement for written disclosure necessitates a systematic approach within the brokerage. Relying on verbal disclosures is insufficient and non-compliant. The brokerage must implement standardized disclosure forms and procedures to ensure these disclosures are consistently generated, delivered to the client for acknowledgment, and retained for record-keeping purposes. Failure to do so creates significant compliance risk with GREC.²³

4. Federal Oversight: RESPA Implications

While state law presents significant hurdles, the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) also governs relationships and payments between settlement service providers, although its applicability to the specific loans in question is limited.

4.1. Referral Fee Prohibitions (Section 8)

RESPA Section 8(a) generally prohibits giving or accepting any fee, kickback, or “thing of value” pursuant to an agreement or understanding (oral or written) for the referral of settlement service business involving federally related mortgage loans.²⁶

• Broad Definitions: RESPA defines “thing of value” very broadly to include money, discounts, services, trips, advertising subsidies, leads, and more.²⁹ “Settlement service” is also defined broadly, encompassing services like mortgage loan origination, processing, underwriting, title services, appraisals, inspections, and real estate brokerage services.²⁶ An “agreement or understanding” does not need to be explicit and can be established by a pattern or practice where referrals are linked to benefits received.³³
• Penalties: Violations of RESPA Section 8 can lead to severe penalties, including criminal charges (fines up to $10,000, imprisonment up to one year) and civil liability (treble damages).³²
• Broker-to-Broker Exception: RESPA explicitly permits payments between real estate brokers pursuant to cooperative brokerage and referral arrangements.²⁶

The expansive definitions under RESPA mean that if a loan is covered by the Act, nearly any benefit exchanged between a real estate brokerage and a lender that is tied to referrals could potentially constitute a violation. This necessitates careful scrutiny of marketing agreements, sponsorships, or other financial interactions when dealing with RESPA-covered loans.

4.2. The Business Purpose Loan Exemption (§ 1024.5(b)(2))

Crucially for this analysis, RESPA regulations contain an explicit exemption for certain types of loans. Regulation X (12 CFR § 1024.5(b)(2)) states that RESPA does not apply to extensions of credit primarily for business, commercial, or agricultural purposes.³⁸ The determination of whether a loan meets this exemption relies on the criteria set forth in Regulation Z (Truth in Lending Act), specifically 12 CFR § 1026.3(a)(1).³⁸

Hard money loans provided to seasoned real estate investors for the purpose of acquiring and renovating non-owner occupied properties for resale (fix-and-flip) are generally considered business purpose loans. Therefore, these specific loan transactions likely fall under the RESPA exemption.³⁸

The primary implication of this exemption is that RESPA Section 8’s prohibition against referral fees does not apply to these business purpose hard money loans. Consequently, federal law does not prohibit the brokerage or its agents from receiving a flat fee or a percentage-based fee from the hard money lender for referring these investor clients for these specific types of loans.

This exemption significantly shifts the compliance landscape. While RESPA may permit the referral fee, state law – specifically GRMA’s MLO licensing requirements and GREC’s mandatory disclosure rules – remains applicable and becomes the primary regulatory focus. The brokerage cannot rely solely on the RESPA exemption; it must ensure full compliance with Georgia state regulations.

Although these loans are likely exempt from RESPA, maintaining clear documentation within the loan file that substantiates the business purpose of each transaction (e.g., borrower certification, property type documentation) is a prudent risk management practice. This documentation would support the reliance on the RESPA exemption should the characterization of the loans ever be questioned by regulators.

4.3. Affiliated Business Arrangement (AfBA) Considerations

RESPA also addresses situations where referring parties have an ownership or affiliate relationship with the entity receiving the referral – known as Affiliated Business Arrangements (AfBAs).³⁵ RESPA permits referrals to AfBAs under a specific safe harbor (§ 8(c)(4)) if three conditions are met:

1. The consumer receives a written disclosure describing the nature of the relationship and an estimated range of charges for the referred service.
2. The consumer is not required to use the affiliated entity.
3. The only thing of value received from the arrangement (beyond permitted payments for services rendered) is a return on the ownership interest or franchise relationship.³⁵

These AfBA rules are primarily relevant if the brokerage considers the long-term strategy of forming a Joint Venture (JV) with a hard money lender (discussed in Section 8). Establishing such a JV creates an ownership link that would trigger AfBA requirements under RESPA if the JV originates or refers any RESPA-covered loans, either initially or through future diversification. Even if the JV initially focuses only on exempt business-purpose loans, any expansion into the consumer mortgage space would necessitate implementing full AfBA compliance procedures, adding another layer of regulatory complexity to the JV structure.

5. Evaluating Proposed Compensation Models

The user query identified three potential compensation models for agents participating in hard money financing. Each carries distinct regulatory implications and feasibility considerations under Georgia law, assuming the loans are business-purpose and thus exempt from RESPA’s Section 8 referral fee prohibitions.³⁸

5.1. Model 1: $250 Flat Fee (Referral)

• Description: The agent refers a seasoned investor client to a partner hard money lender. Upon successful loan closing, the agent (via the brokerage) receives a pre-agreed $250 flat fee.
• Compliance Analysis:

• GRMA/MLO Licensing: This model presents the lowest risk regarding MLO licensing. Because the compensation is a flat fee and not contingent on the loan amount, terms, or negotiation efforts, it is less likely to be construed by the DBF as the agent being “actively engaged in the business of negotiating mortgage loans”.¹⁶ However, some interpretative risk remains, as the DBF could potentially view any compensation for facilitating a mortgage as requiring a license.
• RESPA: Likely exempt due to the business purpose nature of the loans.³⁸
• GREC Disclosure: Mandatory. Written disclosure must be provided to the client stating that the licensee/brokerage will receive a thing of value ($250) for the referral to the lender, per O.C.G.A. § 43-40-25(b)(6)(C).²³
• Feasibility/Profitability: This model is the simplest to implement from a compliance perspective, requiring primarily the setup of disclosure procedures and lender agreements. The profitability per transaction is modest ($250). Generating significant supplemental income would require a substantial volume of successful referrals. Some lenders offer flat referral fees, though amounts vary (e.g., The Hard Money Co. offers $750 for new borrower referrals ⁴¹).

5.2. Model 2: 25% of Origination Fee (Referral Partner)

• Description: The agent acts as a “referral partner” and receives 25% of the origination fee charged by the hard money lender upon closing.
• Compliance Analysis:

• GRMA/MLO Licensing: This model carries a high risk of requiring an MLO license. The compensation is directly calculated based on a component of the loan’s cost (the origination fee), strongly suggesting the agent’s compensation is tied to the successful placement and terms of the loan. This activity likely constitutes being “actively engaged” in negotiating, placing, or finding a mortgage for compensation, thereby falling outside the narrow real estate licensee exemption and triggering MLO license requirements under GRMA.⁹
• RESPA: Likely exempt due to the business purpose nature of the loans.³⁸
• GREC Disclosure: Mandatory written disclosure to the client is required.²³
• Feasibility/Profitability: Offers higher potential income per transaction compared to Model 1. However, the likely requirement for agents to obtain MLO licenses significantly increases the complexity, cost (education, testing, fees), and time required for implementation. Lender partnership programs vary; some pay percentage-based fees but may have specific requirements or definitions for “referral partners” versus more involved “brokers”.⁴² For example, Easy Street Capital offers 0.5% of the loan amount (not origination fee) to referring agents ⁴³, while Washington Capital Partners distinguishes between less-involved “Referral Partners” (paid on first loan only) and more-involved “Loan Brokers” (paid on all loans).⁴⁵ The brokerage must ensure the lender’s program aligns with the agent’s licensed status and activities.

5.3. Model 3: 2% of Loan Amount (Hard Money Broker)

• Description: The agent acts effectively as a hard money broker, receiving compensation equal to 2% of the total loan amount funded.
• Compliance Analysis:

• GRMA/MLO Licensing: This model presents the highest risk and almost certainly requires compliance with GRMA licensing. Compensation is directly tied to the loan amount, and the role implies activities fitting the definition of a “mortgage broker” (soliciting, processing, placing, or negotiating mortgage loans for others).¹² Participating agents must hold active Georgia MLO licenses.⁹ Furthermore, depending on the structure and activities, the brokerage firm itself may need to obtain a Georgia Mortgage Broker license from the DBF.¹¹
• RESPA: Likely exempt due to the business purpose nature of the loans.³⁸
• GREC Disclosure: Mandatory written disclosure to the client is required.²³ This model also heightens potential conflict of interest concerns (see Section 6.1).
• Feasibility/Profitability: Offers the highest potential income per transaction. However, it also presents the highest compliance barrier, demanding significant investment in MLO licensing for agents, potentially company-level mortgage broker licensing, robust compliance infrastructure, and specialized E&O insurance. This model aligns with traditional mortgage broker compensation but requires treating this activity as a distinct, regulated business line. Several hard money lenders explicitly offer programs for brokers.⁴⁴

5.4. Comparative Analysis of Compensation Models

The following table summarizes the key differences between the three proposed models:

This comparison highlights the fundamental trade-off: higher potential income is directly linked to significantly increased regulatory requirements, implementation complexity, and compliance risk, primarily driven by Georgia’s MLO licensing laws.

6. Operationalizing Hard Money Activities: Risk & Compliance

Successfully integrating hard money lending referrals or brokering requires careful attention to operational risks and the implementation of robust compliance measures.

6.1. Managing Conflicts of Interest (BRRETA, GREC)

Receiving compensation tied to a client’s financing introduces a potential conflict of interest. The agent and brokerage gain financially if the client uses the referred lender and secures a loan, which could potentially influence the advice given or actions taken during the real estate transaction itself.

Georgia’s Brokerage Relationships in Real Estate Transactions Act (BRRETA) governs the duties of licensees. While BRRETA replaces general fiduciary duties with specific statutory duties ⁴⁷, core obligations remain, including performing brokerage engagement terms, promoting the client’s interests, and disclosing material facts.⁴⁷ Critically, this includes disclosing adverse material facts and any potential conflicts or material relationships that could impair the broker’s ability to exercise fair judgment.²⁴

When receiving compensation for a mortgage referral (especially under Models 2 and 3), the financial relationship with the lender constitutes a material fact and potential conflict that must be disclosed transparently to the client in writing, and client consent should ideally be obtained.²⁷ The Georgia Association of REALTORS® (GAR) forms, while perhaps not having a specific form for this scenario, emphasize disclosing material relationships.⁵¹

Beyond legal compliance, managing client perception is vital. Seasoned investors, the brokerage’s target clientele, are sophisticated parties. They must trust that a lender recommendation is based on merit (best terms, reliability, suitability for their needs) and not solely on the referral fee paid to the agent. Failure to manage this perception through clear disclosure and consistently ethical conduct can erode trust and damage the brokerage’s reputation, potentially negating any financial benefits.⁵²

To mitigate these risks, the brokerage must establish a clear internal policy. This policy should dictate acceptable interactions with lenders, mandate the use of standardized disclosure forms, define procedures for obtaining client acknowledgment, and guide agents on navigating potential conflicts in alignment with BRRETA and GREC requirements. This ensures consistency and reduces the risk of individual agent errors.

6.2. Ensuring Proper Client Disclosures

As established, GREC rule O.C.G.A. § 43-40-25(b)(6)(C) mandates written disclosure to the client before or at the time of referral whenever a licensee receives anything of value for referring any service or product, including mortgage services.²³

The disclosure must clearly state that the brokerage/agent will receive compensation from the lender for the referral. It must be in writing. Relying on individual agents to draft these disclosures ad-hoc is highly risky and likely to lead to inconsistencies or omissions. The brokerage should develop a standardized, GREC-compliant disclosure form that clearly explains the relationship and the fact that compensation is received. This form should be presented to the client for review and signature/acknowledgment before the referral is formally made, and a copy retained in the transaction file.

If the brokerage pursues Models 2 or 3, requiring agents to obtain MLO licenses, those agents (and the sponsoring lender/broker entity) will be subject to additional, extensive disclosure requirements under GRMA ⁵⁴ and potentially federal laws like the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) ⁵⁵, although TILA primarily applies to consumer credit. While the MLO/lender typically handles these specific loan disclosures, the brokerage must ensure its MLO-licensed agents understand and comply with all applicable requirements.

6.3. Errors & Omissions (E&O) Insurance Coverage

Engaging in activities beyond traditional real estate sales and leasing, such as mortgage referrals for compensation or mortgage brokering, may fall outside the scope of a standard real estate E&O policy. Many policies contain specific exclusions for mortgage brokering, loan origination, banking activities, or services requiring licenses other than a real estate license.⁵⁶

The brokerage must meticulously review its current E&O insurance policy, paying close attention to the definitions of “Professional Services,” “Covered Activities,” and the list of Exclusions.⁶⁰ It is imperative to proactively contact the insurance provider or agent to verify, in writing, whether the specific proposed activities (receiving flat referral fees, receiving percentage-based compensation as a referral partner, or acting as a licensed MLO/broker) are covered under the existing policy.⁶² Assuming coverage exists without confirmation is a significant financial risk.

If the current policy does not cover the intended activities, the brokerage must explore options:

1. Policy Rider/Endorsement: Inquire if the existing policy can be amended via a rider or endorsement to include the new activities, likely for an additional premium.
2. Separate Mortgage Broker E&O Policy: Obtain a distinct E&O policy specifically designed to cover mortgage brokering and origination activities.⁵⁶ Several carriers offer such policies in Georgia.⁵⁶

Georgia law does not mandate E&O insurance for general real estate licensees (unless providing community association management), but it may be required by franchisors, lenders, or be a prudent business practice.⁶² However, if the brokerage or its agents obtain mortgage licenses (Broker or MLO), separate E&O or surety bond requirements may apply under DBF regulations (Note: Georgia DBF requires surety bonds for licensed Mortgage Brokers/Lenders ⁷¹, but specific E&O mandates for MLOs/Brokers were not explicitly detailed for Georgia in the provided snippets, unlike some other states ⁷²).

It is also crucial to understand that most E&O policies are “claims-made,” meaning coverage applies only if the policy is active when the claim is made, and often requires continuous coverage back to the time of the act giving rise to the claim (prior acts coverage).⁵⁸ Any gap in coverage can be detrimental.

The potential cost of additional E&O insurance must be factored into the financial viability assessment of each compensation model. Higher-risk activities associated with Models 2 and 3 are more likely to require additional, potentially costly, E&O coverage, thereby impacting the net profitability of those approaches.

6.4. Establishing Internal Compliance & Training Protocols

Implementing a formal internal compliance program is essential, particularly if pursuing Models 2 or 3, but also advisable for Model 1 to ensure consistent disclosure. Key components include:

• Written Policies & Procedures: Develop comprehensive internal guidelines detailing permissible activities under each model, the specific compensation structures allowed, mandatory GREC and conflict-of-interest disclosure procedures, documentation standards, record-keeping requirements, and MLO licensing maintenance protocols (if applicable).
• Mandatory Training: Conduct regular, mandatory training for all participating agents.⁵⁵ This training must cover:

• Georgia regulations: GREC rules (especially disclosures, UTPs), BRRETA (duties, conflicts), GRMA (MLO licensing triggers, exemptions).
• Federal regulations: RESPA business purpose exemption.
• Brokerage policies: Specific procedures for referrals, disclosures, documentation, lender interactions.
• Scope of Activity: Clearly defining what activities are permissible based on whether an agent holds an MLO license.
• Ethical Conduct: Emphasizing client best interests and risk mitigation.⁵⁵ Resources for real estate and mortgage compliance training are available.⁷⁴

• Supervision and Auditing: Implement a system for supervising agent activities related to lender referrals/brokering. This includes reviewing disclosures for compliance, tracking MLO license status and continuing education (if applicable), and periodically auditing files.⁵⁵
• Record-Keeping: Establish clear protocols for maintaining records of all client disclosures, acknowledgments, referral documentation, lender agreements, and MLO license information (if applicable).⁵⁵

Developing and maintaining such a program requires a commitment of resources (management time, potentially compliance personnel or tools). This operational burden may be more significant for smaller brokerages, potentially impacting the feasibility and scalability of the more complex compensation models (Models 2 and 3). Success hinges not just on having rules, but on fostering a culture of compliance where agents understand the importance of ethical conduct and regulatory adherence.⁵⁵

7. Partnering with Hard Money Lenders in Georgia

Selecting the right hard money lending partners and understanding their partnership structures are crucial steps.

7.1. Identifying Suitable Lenders (Atlanta Focus)

Numerous hard money lenders operate in Georgia, with many serving the Atlanta market and specializing in financing for fix-and-flip investors. Based on the research, potential partners include:

• Asset Based Lending (ABL) ⁷⁸
• Kiavi ⁸⁰
• Easy Street Capital ⁴³
• Capital Fund 1 ⁸⁸
• Coastal Equity Group ⁹⁰
• Longhorn Investments ⁹¹
• Tidal Loans ⁹²
• Rehab Financial Group (RFG) ⁹³
• Yieldi ⁴⁶
• The Hard Money Co. ⁴¹
• New Silver ⁹⁴
• Washington Capital Partners ⁴⁵
• The Investor’s Edge ⁹⁵

Thorough due diligence is essential before establishing any partnership. The brokerage should evaluate potential lenders based on:

• Reputation and Track Record: Verify their history and reliability in the Atlanta market.
• Loan Programs: Ensure their offerings align with the needs of seasoned fix-and-flip investors (e.g., LTV/ARV limits, rehab financing, loan amounts).⁴³
• Terms and Pricing: Compare interest rates, origination points/fees, and other costs.
• Speed and Efficiency: Assess their typical timeframes for approval and closing, as speed is often critical for investors.⁷⁸
• Client Suitability: Confirm their experience and processes are suitable for working with seasoned investors, who may have different expectations than novices.
• Partnership Programs: Understand their specific programs for referrals or brokers (see Section 7.2).

Choosing a lender whose operational style and client focus align well with the brokerage’s own standards and client base is critical. A mismatch in service levels or program suitability can lead to frustration for both agents and their investor clients, undermining the goal of the partnership.

7.2. Understanding Partnership Structures

Hard money lenders offer various ways for real estate professionals to partner with them, generally falling into two categories:

• Referral Partner Programs: These typically involve introducing a qualified borrower to the lender. The referring agent usually has minimal involvement after the introduction. Compensation is often a flat fee paid upon closing (e.g., $750 for a new borrower from The Hard Money Co. ⁴¹) or sometimes a small percentage of the loan amount (e.g., 0.50% from Easy Street Capital ⁴³). Washington Capital Partners defines this role as hands-off after the introduction, typically compensated only for the first loan closed by the referred borrower.⁴⁵ Asset Based Lending also offers a referral program.⁴⁴ This structure aligns best with Model 1 compensation.
• Loan Broker Programs: These programs usually expect the broker (the referring agent/brokerage) to be more involved in the process, potentially assisting with the application, gathering documents, or acting as a liaison. Compensation is typically higher and may be structured as a percentage of the loan amount, a share of the origination fee, or points. Brokers may be compensated for multiple loans closed by the same referred client.⁴⁵ Lenders like Yieldi ⁴⁶, Washington Capital Partners ⁴⁵, and ABL ⁴⁴ explicitly work with brokers. Kiavi also appears to have a broker program.⁸⁰ This structure aligns more closely with Models 2 and 3 compensation and, as discussed, carries significant MLO licensing implications under Georgia law. The lender’s requirements for participating brokers (e.g., holding an MLO license) must be clearly understood.

The type of partnership program offered by the lender must align with the brokerage’s chosen compensation model and corresponding compliance strategy. For instance, a brokerage cannot expect to receive 2% of the loan amount (Model 3) by participating in a lender’s simple flat-fee “Referral Partner” program that requires minimal involvement. The structure dictates the necessary compliance actions; a simple referral primarily triggers GREC disclosure, while a broker partnership points strongly towards GRMA MLO licensing.

7.3. Overview of Select Georgia Hard Money Lender Partner Programs

The following table provides a high-level summary based on available information for a selection of lenders active in Georgia. Direct verification with each lender regarding current program details, compensation, and requirements is essential.

Note: This table is illustrative based on available snippets. Compensation and terms can change and require direct confirmation.

This comparison provides a starting point for identifying potential lender partners whose programs might align with the brokerage’s strategic goals and chosen compensation model.

8. The Joint Venture Alternative

Forming a joint venture (JV) with a hard money lender represents a fundamentally different, long-term strategic approach compared to referral or brokering models.

8.1. Strategic Rationale: Pros and Cons

• Potential Benefits:

• Higher Profit Potential: Opportunity to share in the overall profits of the lending operation, potentially exceeding fee-based income.
• Integrated Services: Ability to offer clients a more seamless experience combining real estate brokerage and financing.
• Greater Control: More influence over the lending process and product offerings compared to a referral relationship.
• Asset Building: Potential to build equity value in the JV entity itself over the long term.
• Potential Drawbacks:

• Significant Capital Investment: The brokerage would likely need to contribute substantial capital to the JV.⁹⁸
• Increased Complexity: Requires establishing and managing a separate legal entity, with complex governance and operational structures.⁹⁸
• Shared Liability and Risk: The brokerage shares in the financial and legal risks of the lending operation.
• Regulatory Burden: The JV entity itself would likely need DBF licensing, and RESPA AfBA compliance would be necessary if handling covered loans (see Section 8.3).
• Partner Conflicts: Potential for disagreements over strategy, management, distributions, or exit.⁹⁸
• Time Commitment: Requires significant management time and resources for setup and ongoing operations.

A JV structure offers the potential for greater financial rewards but demands a much higher level of investment, risk assumption, and operational complexity compared to fee-based models. It represents a trade-off between control/return potential and required resources/risk.

8.2. Structural and Legal Considerations in Georgia

• Structure: Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) are often preferred for real estate JVs in Georgia due to their flexibility in management structure, liability protection for members, and pass-through tax treatment.⁹⁸ Georgia law recognizes JVs as legal persons.¹⁰⁰
• JV Agreement: A comprehensive, professionally drafted JV operating agreement is essential.⁹⁸ Key provisions include:

• Capital Contributions: Amount, timing, and form of each partner’s investment.
• Profit/Loss Allocations & Distributions: Detailed “waterfall” provisions outlining how cash flow and capital event proceeds are distributed.⁹⁹ Lenders providing debt financing to the JV will scrutinize these, often requiring debt service be paid before member returns.¹⁰¹
• Management and Control: Defining roles, responsibilities, and decision-making authority (e.g., managing member vs. investor member rights on major decisions).⁹⁹ Lenders may restrict the investor member’s ability to take control under certain circumstances.¹⁰¹
• Exit Strategies: Buy-sell provisions, rights of first refusal/offer, dissolution triggers.⁹⁸ Lender approval may be required for transfers or forced sales.¹⁰¹
• Dispute Resolution: Mechanisms for resolving disagreements between partners.⁹⁸

• Partner Due Diligence: Thorough vetting of the potential lender partner’s financial stability, reputation, expertise, and alignment of business goals is critical.⁹⁸
• Lender Considerations: The hard money lender partner, likely providing significant capital and holding the necessary lending licenses, will probably have substantial leverage in negotiating the JV agreement terms, particularly concerning control mechanisms and financial distributions to protect their investment.¹⁰¹ The real estate brokerage requires experienced legal counsel specializing in JVs and regulatory compliance to negotiate effectively.³⁹

8.3. Regulatory Hurdles (DBF Licensing, RESPA AfBA)

A JV structure significantly increases the regulatory burden compared to referral models.

• DBF Licensing: The JV entity itself, if engaging in mortgage brokering or lending activities in Georgia, would almost certainly need to obtain the appropriate license (Mortgage Broker or Mortgage Lender) from the DBF.¹⁰ Individuals within the JV performing MLO functions (taking applications, negotiating terms) would also need individual MLO licenses.¹⁰ This involves meeting all DBF requirements for capitalization, surety bonding, background checks, and operational standards.
• RESPA AfBA Compliance: As discussed in Section 4.3, a JV between a real estate brokerage and a lender constitutes an Affiliated Business Arrangement. If the JV handles any RESPA-covered loans (even if diversifying later), it must comply with RESPA’s AfBA rules: providing consumers with the AfBA disclosure, ensuring non-required use of the JV’s services, and limiting compensation to partners to returns on ownership interest.³⁵
• Dual Regulation: The JV would operate under a dual regulatory framework. The lending activities fall under DBF jurisdiction, while the real estate brokerage activities conducted by the brokerage partner remain subject to GREC rules and BRRETA. This increases overall compliance complexity and cost.

Given these substantial legal, financial, structural, and regulatory requirements, forming a JV is a complex, long-term strategic decision. It requires significant upfront planning, capital, legal expertise, and ongoing resource commitment. It is not a viable short-term solution to commission pressures but could be considered as part of a multi-year diversification strategy after demonstrating success and market understanding through less complex models.

9. Strategic Recommendations & Conclusion

The exploration of supplemental income from hard money lending activities presents both opportunities and significant regulatory challenges for a Georgia real estate brokerage. The recent NAR settlement underscores the strategic importance of diversifying revenue, but the path chosen must prioritize compliance with Georgia state laws (GRMA, GREC rules, BRRETA) and federal regulations (RESPA, although likely exempt for the target loans).

Based on the analysis, the following tiered recommendations are provided:

Recommendation 1: Short-Term / Low-Risk Approach (Focus on Compliant Referrals)

• Action: Implement Model 1 only (Flat Fee Referral, e.g., $250 or similar negotiated flat amount).
• Rationale: This model carries the lowest risk of triggering Georgia MLO licensing requirements, although some DBF interpretive risk remains. It minimizes implementation complexity and cost.
• Compliance Imperatives:

• Mandatory GREC Disclosure: Develop and consistently use a standardized written disclosure form, provided to and acknowledged by the client before referral, stating that the brokerage/agent receives a fee for the lender referral.²³
• Lender Partner Selection: Partner with reputable hard money lenders whose programs explicitly support flat-fee referrals and are suitable for seasoned investors.⁴¹
• E&O Verification: Obtain written confirmation from the E&O insurance carrier that receiving flat referral fees for mortgage services is a covered activity under the brokerage’s policy.⁶⁴
• Documentation: Maintain clear records of disclosures, client acknowledgments, and the business purpose nature of referred loans.³⁸
• Training: Train agents on the limits of this model (referral only, no negotiation) and the mandatory disclosure process.
• Trade-off: Accepts lower per-transaction revenue in exchange for significantly reduced regulatory burden and risk.

Recommendation 2: Medium-Term / Higher Investment Approach (Selective MLO Licensing)

• Action: If higher income potential is a priority, consider selectively supporting qualified and interested agents in obtaining Georgia MLO licenses to pursue Model 2 (Percentage of Origination Fee) or Model 3 (Percentage of Loan Amount) as licensed MLOs.
• Rationale: These models offer higher income but unequivocally require MLO licensing under GRMA for the participating agents.⁹ This approach treats mortgage brokering as a distinct, regulated activity.
• Compliance Imperatives:

• MLO Licensing: Budget for and support agents through the MLO licensing process (education, testing, fees).¹⁸
• Brokerage Licensing: Evaluate if the brokerage firm itself needs a Mortgage Broker license from the DBF based on the structure and agent activities.¹¹ Obtain legal counsel on this point.
• Robust Compliance Program: Implement comprehensive internal policies, mandatory MLO-specific training, supervisory oversight, and record-keeping protocols.⁵⁵
• E&O Coverage: Secure appropriate E&O coverage, likely a separate Mortgage Broker E&O policy or a specific rider confirming coverage for licensed MLO activities.⁵⁶
• Lender Partner Selection: Partner only with lenders offering compliant broker programs that recognize and properly compensate licensed MLOs/brokers.⁴⁴
• GREC Disclosure: Continue mandatory written client disclosure regarding compensation.²³
• Trade-off: Requires significant investment in licensing, compliance infrastructure, and potentially higher E&O costs, balanced against potentially higher returns.

Recommendation 3: Long-Term / Strategic Option (Joint Venture)

• Action: Consider a Joint Venture (JV) with a hard money lender only as a long-term strategic initiative after gaining significant experience and market validation under Recommendation 1 or 2.
• Rationale: Offers the highest potential integration and profit-sharing but involves the greatest complexity, capital investment, and regulatory hurdles.
• Compliance Imperatives: Requires extensive legal structuring, negotiation of JV agreements, substantial capital, obtaining DBF entity-level (Broker/Lender) and individual MLO licenses, and RESPA AfBA compliance if applicable.¹⁰
• Trade-off: Highest potential reward profile, but only suitable as a deliberate, well-resourced, long-term strategic move.

Recommendation 4: Avoid Unlicensed Brokering Activity

• Action: Explicitly prohibit agents without an MLO license from engaging in activities associated with Models 2 and 3 (receiving compensation tied to loan origination fees or loan amounts).
• Rationale: Attempting to operate under Models 2 or 3 without the required MLO licenses poses a substantial risk of violating GRMA, potentially leading to significant fines, sanctions, and reputational damage imposed by the DBF.¹⁰ The narrow exemption for real estate licensees does not cover these activities.¹⁶

Conclusion

The pressure from evolving commission structures makes exploring supplemental income streams like hard money lending referrals logical for Georgia brokerages serving investors. However, navigating Georgia’s specific regulatory landscape is paramount. While RESPA’s business purpose exemption likely removes federal barriers to referral fees for these specific loans, Georgia’s GRMA imposes strict MLO licensing requirements for activities beyond simple, flat-fee referrals, and GREC mandates written disclosure for any referral compensation.

The brokerage’s path forward depends critically on its tolerance for regulatory complexity and its willingness to invest in compliance. A low-risk, low-reward referral model is feasible with careful adherence to disclosure rules. Higher-reward models necessitate a significant commitment to MLO licensing and robust internal controls, effectively entering the regulated mortgage brokering space. A joint venture is a complex, long-term undertaking. Engaging specialized legal counsel with expertise in both Georgia real estate law (GREC, BRRETA) and Georgia mortgage regulations (DBF, GRMA) is strongly advised before implementing any program involving compensation for mortgage-related activities. Careful planning and unwavering commitment to compliance are essential for successfully and legally leveraging this opportunity.

Works cited

1. The NAR Settlement and It’s Impact on the Real Estate Industry – The Pearl Antonacci Group, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.pearlantonacci.com/blog/the-nar-settlement-and-its-impact-on-the-real-estate-industry/
2. 9 important agent takeaways from the NAR lawsuit settlement – Real Estate News, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.realestatenews.com/2024/08/08/9-important-agent-takeaways-from-the-nar-lawsuit-settlement
3. NAR Settlement 2024: End of Buyer Agent Commission?, accessed April 13, 2025, https://ecreg.com/nar-settlement-2024-end-of-buyer-agent-commission/
4. The NAR Settlement: Key Changes for Homebuyers – iGrad, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.igrad.com/articles/the-nar-settlement-key-changes-for-homebuyers
5. Questions & Answers regarding NAR’s settlement practice – NEI Global Relocation, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.neirelo.com/articles/nar-lawsuit-update-what-to-know
6. NAR Lawsuit Explained: Key Changes Expected in 2024 – ValueLink Software, accessed April 13, 2025, https://valuelinksoftware.com/nar-lawsuit-explained-key-changes-expected-in-2024
7. What the real estate commission changes mean for homebuyers and sellers – Bankrate, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/real-estate/real-estate-commission-changes/
8. What the NAR Settlement Means for Home Buyers and Sellers, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.nar.realtor/the-facts/what-the-nar-settlement-means-for-home-buyers-and-sellers
9. GA Mortgage Loan Originator License New Application Checklist (Individual) – NMLS, accessed April 13, 2025, https://mortgage.nationwidelicensingsystem.org/slr/publishedstatedocuments/ga-mlo-new-application-checklist.pdf
10. Mortgage Industry Frequently Asked Questions – Department of Banking and Finance, accessed April 13, 2025, https://dbf.georgia.gov/mb-brokers-lenders-and-originators/mortgage-faq
11. Mortgage Brokers and Mortgage Lenders – Department of Banking and Finance, accessed April 13, 2025, https://dbf.georgia.gov/mortgage-brokers-and-mortgage-lenders
12. Georgia Code § 7-1-1000 (2024) – Definitions – Justia Law, accessed April 13, 2025, https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/title-7/chapter-1/article-13/section-7-1-1000/
13. Georgia Code Title 7. Banking and Finance § 7-1-1000 | FindLaw, accessed April 13, 2025, https://codes.findlaw.com/ga/title-7-banking-and-finance/ga-code-sect-7-1-1000/
14. Georgia Residential Mortgage Act (“GRMA”) FAQ | Department of Banking and Finance, accessed April 13, 2025, https://dbf.georgia.gov/georgia-residential-mortgage-act-grma-faq
15. Georgia – Mortgage Bankers Association, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.mba.org/docs/default-source/cmf-policy/licensing-by-state/cmf-state-licensing-laws-georgia-2020.pdf?sfvrsn=2ddf8a82_1
16. Q: Are real estate brokers subject to licensure as a Mortgage Loan Originator under the SAFE requirements contained in the Geor, accessed April 13, 2025, https://dbf.georgia.gov/document/publication/159093506realestatebrokerqapdf/download
17. Georgia Code § 7-1-1001 (2024) – Exemption for certain persons …, accessed April 13, 2025, https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/title-7/chapter-1/article-13/section-7-1-1001/
18. Georgia MLO Licensing and CE Courses | OnCourse Learning, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.oncourselearning.com/mortgage/georgia-license-requirements
19. How to Get an NMLS Mortgage License in Georgia, accessed April 13, 2025, https://mortgageeducators.com/219-georgia-mortgage-license-training-mortgage-educators-compliance
20. How to Get Georgia MLO Education Course Licensing Information Online – AAA Mortgage Training, accessed April 13, 2025, https://aaamortgagetraining.com/states/georgia
21. MLO Education & Testing | Department of Banking and Finance – Georgia.gov, accessed April 13, 2025, https://dbf.georgia.gov/mb-brokers-lenders-and-originators/mlo-education-testing
22. How Do I Apply for a Mortgage License? – Department of Banking and Finance, accessed April 13, 2025, https://dbf.georgia.gov/mb-brokers-lenders-and-originators/how-do-i-apply-mortgage-license
23. GREC RULES REGARDING REFERRALS – RE/MAX AROUND ATLANTA, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.rmaaresources.com/broker-corner/grec-rules-regarding-referrals
24. GREC RENews, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.drakerealtydata.com/atl/broker_corner/GREC%20Newsletter%20Aug%202015%20-%20Disclose%20Disclose%20Disclose.pdf
25. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. R. 520-1-.14 – Citations | State Regulations, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/georgia/Ga-Comp-R-Regs-R-520-1-.14
26. REFERRAL FEES CAN BE ILLEGAL – RE/MAX AROUND ATLANTA, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.rmaaresources.com/broker-corner/referral-fees-can-be-illegal
27. License Law for Brokers & Agents GREC Course #65208 (as of 4/14/20) Georgia Real Estate Academy GREC School #6915 Director:, accessed April 13, 2025, https://maximumonerealty.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/handout-license-law-for-agents-brokers-65208-april-2020.pdf
28. Legal FAQs – Georgia Association of REALTORS, accessed April 13, 2025, https://garealtor.com/law-ethics/legal-faqs/
29. RESPA Section 8: Key Considerations & Best Practices – Forvis Mazars, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.forvismazars.us/forsights/2025/01/respa-section-8-key-considerations-best-practices
30. Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) – National Association of REALTORS®, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.nar.realtor/real-estate-settlement-procedures-act-respa
31. RESPA – A Guide to Complying with the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, accessed April 13, 2025, https://gmaronline.com/sites/default/files/resources/RESPA-Guide-to-Complying.pdf
32. RESPA: Section 8: The Confusion Continues – Corporate Counsel – FindLaw, accessed April 13, 2025, https://corporate.findlaw.com/finance/respa-section-8-the-confusion-continues.html
33. § 1024.14 Prohibition against kickbacks and unearned fees. | Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1024/14/
34. Mortgage Lenders, REALTORS® and RESPA, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.aaronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/RespaWhtPaper.pdf
35. Kickbacks and Referral Fees RESPA Enforcement P1 P1 P2 P4 P7 P12 – Wisconsin REALTORS® Association, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.wra.org/LU1407/
36. Understanding RESPA: A Comprehensive Guide for Real Estate Agents, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.colibrirealestate.com/career-hub/blog/what-is-respa/
37. Real Estate Kickbacks: What are they? – US Realty Training, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.usrealtytraining.com/blogs/real-estate-agent-kickbacks
38. § 1024.5 Coverage of RESPA. | Consumer Financial Protection …, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1024/5/
39. Affiliated Business Arrangements – Womble Bond Dickinson, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.womblebonddickinson.com/us/services/real-estate/affiliated-business-arrangements
40. Following RESPA Rules – National Association of REALTORS®, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.nar.realtor/ae/manage-your-association/association-policy/following-respa-rules
41. Referral Program – Earn Cash on Every Referral | The Hard Money Co., accessed April 13, 2025, https://thehardmoneyco.com/referral-program/
42. LOAN STARS: ARF Referral Partner Rewards Program – ARF Financial, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.arffinancial.com/loanstars/
43. Real Estate Agent Referral Program – Easy Street Capital, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.easystreetcap.com/real-estate-agent-loan-referral-program/
44. Broker Referral Program | Become a Private Hard Money Broker, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.ablfunding.com/brokers/
45. Loan Broker & Referral Partner Program – Washington Capital Partners, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.washingtoncapitalpartners.com/brokers/
46. Yieldi: Nationwide Hard Money Loans, Atlanta Hard Money Lender, accessed April 13, 2025, https://yieldi.com/
47. Unlocking BRRETA: navigating broker duties and responsibilities in Georgia real estate transactions – Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.fmglaw.com/commercial-litigation-directors-officers/unlocking-brreta-navigating-broker-duties-and-responsibilities-in-georgia-real-estate-transactions/
48. Business Owners:Read This Before Engaging in a Real Estate Transaction, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.bfvlaw.com/business-owners-read-this-before-engaging-in-a-real-estate-transaction/
49. Chapter 24 – The Georgia Brokerage Relationships in Real Estate Transactions Act, accessed April 13, 2025, https://realestateu.com/chapter-24-the-georgia-brokerage-relationships-in-real-estate-transactions/
50. Blog Archives – RE/MAX AROUND ATLANTA, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.rmaaresources.com/broker-corner/archives/06-2023
51. Georgia – The CE Shop, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.theceshop.com/sites/default/files/block_image/GA%20Sample%20Contracts/F110%2001.01.19.pdf
52. Conflicts of interest in real estate transactions | firsttuesday Journal, accessed April 13, 2025, https://journal.firsttuesday.us/conflicts-of-interest-in-real-estate-transactions/92408/
53. Georgia, accessed April 13, 2025, https://images.kw.com/docs/5/5/6/556127/1436973338196_GA___Exclusive_Buyer_Brokerage_Agreement__GAR_F4_.pdf
54. STATE OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE – NMLS, accessed April 13, 2025, https://mortgage.nationwidelicensingsystem.org/slr/common/Documents/TA%20State%20Implementation%20-%20GA%20Rules.pdf
55. Compliance Made Simple: What Every Mortgage Broker Should Know, accessed April 13, 2025, https://admortgage.com/blog/mortgage-compliance-guidelines/
56. Georgia E&O Insurance for Mortgage Brokers, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.reproinsurance.com/mortgage-brokers-georgia.htm
57. E&O Insurance for Real Estate Professionals – 360 Coverage Pros, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.360coveragepros.com/real-estate/errors-and-omissions
58. Errors and Omissions Insurance for Mortgage Brokers, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.cbspecialty.com/mortgage-brokers-bankers.htm
59. CRES Risk Management Webinar: Understanding Obligations and E&O Issues for Real Estate Brokers, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.cresinsurance.com/understanding-obligations-and-eo-issues-for-real-estate-brokers/
60. Alpharetta Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions) Insurance | Insuring Georgia, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.gillmanins.com/insurance-services/business-insurance/professional-liability-errors-omissions-insurance/
61. Georgia E&O Insurance for Real Estate Agents & Brokers, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.reproinsurance.com/real-estate-agents-brokers-georgia.htm
62. Errors & Omissions (E&O) Insurance – National Association of REALTORS®, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.nar.realtor/errors-omissions-eo-insurance
63. Errors and Omissions Insurance for Real Estate Agents – The CE Shop, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.theceshop.com/agent-essentials/real-estate-agent-encyclopedia/errors-and-omissions-insurance
64. Comprehensive Guide to Real Estate E&O Insurance – McGowan Program Administrators, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.mcgowanprograms.com/blog/comprehensive-guide-to-real-estate-eo-insurance/
65. How Real Estate Prior Acts Are Covered with E and O – CRES E&O Insurance, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.cresinsurance.com/are-you-protected-from-prior-acts/
66. Errors and Omissions (E&O) Insurance for Mortgage Brokers, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.reproinsurance.com/mortgage-brokers.htm
67. Mortgage Brokers E&O – Victor Insurance, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.victorinsurance.com/us/solutions/real-estate/mortgage-brokers.html
68. Indiana Errors and Omissions (E&O) Insurance for Mortgage Brokers, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.reproinsurance.com/mortgage-brokers-indiana.htm
69. Georgia Mortgage Brokers Errors and Omissions Insurance, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.cbspecialty.com/mortgage-brokers-e-and-o-insurance-georgia.htm
70. Real Estate Agent / Broker Insurance in Georgia | Insureon, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.insureon.com/real-estate-business-insurance/agents-brokers/georgia
71. Georgia Mortgage Broker Bond | JW Surety Bonds, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.jwsuretybonds.com/states/georgia/mortgage-broker-bond
72. Mortgage Loan Originator Insurance Requirements – Colorado Division of Real Estate, accessed April 13, 2025, https://dre.colorado.gov/division-programs/mortgage-loan-originator/licensing/mortgage-loan-originator-insurance
73. Errors & Omissions Insurance Requirements – FSRA, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.fsrao.ca/media/15796/download
74. Georgia Real Estate, Mortgage, Construction Contracting, Home Inspection, Appraisal, Professional Development & Human Resources Courses Online – OnlineEd, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.onlineed.com/catalog/Georgia
75. Georgia Mortgage Professional Development Courses | OnlineEd, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.onlineed.com/catalog/Georgia/mortgage/professional-development
76. Georgia Real Estate Continuing Education Courses – The CE Shop, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.theceshop.com/online-education/georgia/real-estate/broker-and-sales-license/continuing-education/courses.html
77. Housing Counselor Resources and Training | Georgia Department of Community Affairs, accessed April 13, 2025, https://dca.georgia.gov/affordable-housing/home-ownership/housing-counselor-resources-and-training
78. Savannah GA Hard Money Lender | Quick Close Loans – Asset Based Lending, LLC, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.ablfunding.com/where-we-lend/hard-money-lenders-georgia/savannah-hard-money-loans/
79. Hard Money Loans Atlanta | Private Real Estate Lending, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.ablfunding.com/where-we-lend/hard-money-lenders-georgia/atlanta-hard-money-loans/
80. Georgia Hard Money Lenders – Kiavi, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.kiavi.com/georgia-hard-money-lenders
81. Georgia DSCR Loan Programs – Kiavi, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.kiavi.com/georgia-dscr-loan-programs
82. Georgia Investment Property Lenders – Kiavi, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.kiavi.com/georgia-investment-property-lenders
83. Georgia Private Money Lenders – Kiavi, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.kiavi.com/georgia-private-money-lenders
84. Georgia Portfolio Rental Loans – Kiavi, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.kiavi.com/georgia-portfolio-rental-loans
85. Georgia Fix And Flip Loans – Kiavi, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.kiavi.com/georgia-fix-and-flip-loans
86. Georgia Bridge Loan Lenders – Kiavi, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.kiavi.com/georgia-bridge-loan-lenders
87. Georgia Hard Money Loan – Easy Street Capital, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.easystreetcap.com/hard-money-loan-georgia/
88. Fix and Flip Loans in Atlanta, GA | Capital Fund 1, accessed April 13, 2025, https://capitalfund1.com/georgia-hard-money-lender/atlanta/fix-and-flip-loan/
89. Atlanta Hard Money Lender | Atlanta, GA – Capital Fund 1, accessed April 13, 2025, https://capitalfund1.com/georgia-hard-money-lender/atlanta/
90. Coastal Equity Group: Hard Money Lending for Real Estate Investors, accessed April 13, 2025, https://coastalequitygroup.com/
91. Atlanta Hard Money Lenders – Longhorn Investments, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.longhorninvestments.com/markets-served/georgia/atlanta-hard-money-loans
92. hard money lenders atlanta georgia – Tidal loans, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.tidalloans.com/rental-property-loans-atlanta/
93. Atlanta Hard Money Lender: Fix & Flip, Rental Property & Rehab Loans, accessed April 13, 2025, https://rehabfinancial.com/atlanta-hard-money-lender
94. New Silver: Hard Money Lenders For Real Estate Investors, accessed April 13, 2025, https://newsilver.com/
95. Hard Money Loans in Georgia | 100% Financing | The Investor’s Edge, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.theinvestorsedge.com/hard-money-loans/georgia
96. accessed December 31, 1969, https://www.kiavi.com/brokers
97. Asset-Based Loan Referral Program – Access Business Finance, accessed April 13, 2025, https://accessbusinessfinance.com/referral-program/
98. What To Know About Real Estate Joint Ventures – Brian Douglas Law, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.atlantagaestateplanning.com/blog/2024/05/29/what-to-know-about-real-estate-joint-ventures/
99. REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES INVOLVING PRIVATE EQUITY FUNDS: REGULATORY, STRUCTURING, AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS – Benesch Law, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.beneschlaw.com/a/web/39221/8nKCVb/prel2211_kamin_oakes_tapley.pdf
100. Georgia Code § 44-14-5 (2024) – Practices prohibited in connection with certain residential real estate transactions – Justia Law, accessed April 13, 2025, https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/title-44/chapter-14/article-1/section-44-14-5/
101. Law & Accounting Consider lender concerns in your joint venture agreement – Ballard Spahr, accessed April 13, 2025, https://www.ballardspahr.com/-/jssmedia/files/articles/crej-lender-concerns-article—hamberger.pdf?rev=3f8bfb013f324b89a56f49e7ebf0ab06&hash=F5E20D1A048237065A67EAF5E3618698